Multiphase flow in pipelines involves multiple phases flowing together, like gas and liquid. This complex phenomenon is crucial in oil and gas production, where mixtures of hydrocarbons and water flow through pipes. Understanding flow regimes, pressure gradients, and phase interactions is key to efficient pipeline design and operation.
This topic covers various aspects of multiphase flow, including flow types, key parameters, and modeling approaches. We'll explore flow regimes in horizontal, vertical, and inclined pipes, as well as methods for predicting pressure gradients, , and flow behavior in different regimes like slug, annular, and .
Types of multiphase flow in pipelines
Multiphase flow in pipelines involves the simultaneous flow of two or more phases, such as gas-liquid, liquid-liquid, or gas-liquid-solid mixtures
The behavior and characteristics of multiphase flow depend on factors such as the properties of the fluids, the flow rates, and the pipeline geometry
Common types of multiphase flow in pipelines include gas-liquid flow (natural gas and oil), liquid-liquid flow (oil and water), and gas-liquid-solid flow (gas, oil, and sand)
Key parameters of multiphase pipeline flow
Superficial velocities of phases
Top images from around the web for Superficial velocities of phases
Frontiers | Petrological Geodynamics of Mantle Melting I. AlphaMELTS + Multiphase Flow: Dynamic ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Fluid Dynamics – University Physics Volume 1 View original
Is this image relevant?
Computer Simulation of the Multiphase Flow in a Peirce-Smith Copper Converter View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Petrological Geodynamics of Mantle Melting I. AlphaMELTS + Multiphase Flow: Dynamic ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Fluid Dynamics – University Physics Volume 1 View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Superficial velocities of phases
Frontiers | Petrological Geodynamics of Mantle Melting I. AlphaMELTS + Multiphase Flow: Dynamic ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Fluid Dynamics – University Physics Volume 1 View original
Is this image relevant?
Computer Simulation of the Multiphase Flow in a Peirce-Smith Copper Converter View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Petrological Geodynamics of Mantle Melting I. AlphaMELTS + Multiphase Flow: Dynamic ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Fluid Dynamics – University Physics Volume 1 View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
is the velocity of a phase assuming it occupies the entire cross-sectional area of the pipeline
Calculated by dividing the volumetric flow rate of a phase by the cross-sectional area of the pipeline
Superficial velocities are used to characterize the flow rates of individual phases in multiphase flow
In-situ phase fractions
represent the actual volume fraction of each phase present in the pipeline at a given location
Determined by the ratio of the volume of a phase to the total volume of the mixture
In-situ phase fractions are important for understanding the distribution and interaction of phases in multiphase flow
Fluid properties of phases
Fluid properties such as density, viscosity, and surface tension significantly influence the behavior of multiphase flow in pipelines
Density differences between phases affect the and phase distribution
Viscosity impacts the and the stability of flow regimes
Surface tension affects the formation and stability of interfaces between phases
Pipeline geometry and inclination
, roughness, and inclination angle have a significant impact on multiphase flow behavior
Larger diameters generally result in lower pressure gradients and different flow regime transitions compared to smaller diameters
Pipeline roughness influences the frictional pressure gradient and can promote or suppress certain flow regimes
Inclination angle affects the gravitational pressure gradient and the distribution of phases along the pipeline (horizontal, vertical, or inclined)
Flow regimes in multiphase pipelines
Horizontal pipeline flow regimes
Horizontal multiphase flow exhibits distinct flow regimes depending on the superficial velocities and fluid properties
Common flow regimes in horizontal pipelines include stratified flow (smooth or wavy), intermittent flow (plug or slug), , and
The occurrence of specific flow regimes depends on the balance between gravitational, inertial, and interfacial forces
Vertical pipeline flow regimes
Vertical multiphase flow is characterized by different flow regimes compared to horizontal flow
Typical flow regimes in vertical pipelines include , , , and annular flow
The transition between flow regimes in vertical pipelines is influenced by the gas and liquid velocities, as well as the fluid properties
Inclined pipeline flow regimes
Inclined multiphase flow exhibits a combination of characteristics from horizontal and vertical flow, depending on the inclination angle
Flow regimes in inclined pipelines can include stratified flow (with a tilted interface), slug flow (with elongated bubbles), and churn flow (with oscillatory behavior)
The inclination angle affects the gravitational force component acting on the phases and can lead to unique flow regime transitions
Flow regime maps and transitions
are used to predict the occurrence of different flow regimes based on the superficial velocities of the phases
Common flow regime maps include the Mandhane map, the Taitel-Dukler map, and the Barnea map
Flow regime transitions occur when the balance between forces acting on the phases changes, leading to a shift from one flow regime to another
Predicting flow regime transitions is essential for the accurate modeling and design of multiphase pipeline systems
Pressure gradient in multiphase pipelines
Gravitational pressure gradient
The gravitational pressure gradient is caused by the elevation change along the pipeline and the density difference between the phases
In horizontal pipelines, the gravitational pressure gradient is zero, while in vertical or inclined pipelines, it depends on the in-situ density of the mixture
Calculating the gravitational pressure gradient requires knowledge of the in-situ phase fractions and the inclination angle of the pipeline
Frictional pressure gradient
The frictional pressure gradient arises from the shear stress between the fluids and the pipeline wall, as well as the interfacial shear stress between the phases
Frictional pressure gradient depends on factors such as the flow regime, fluid properties, and pipeline roughness
Various empirical correlations and mechanistic models are used to predict the frictional pressure gradient in multiphase flow, such as the and the
Accelerational pressure gradient
The is caused by the change in kinetic energy of the fluids along the pipeline
It is significant in cases where there is a substantial change in the velocity of the phases, such as in the case of phase change or rapid expansion/contraction of the pipeline
The accelerational pressure gradient is usually negligible compared to the gravitational and frictional components in most multiphase pipeline flow scenarios
Liquid holdup in multiphase pipelines
Liquid holdup vs flow regimes
Liquid holdup refers to the fraction of the pipeline volume occupied by the liquid phase
The liquid holdup varies significantly depending on the flow regime and the operating conditions
In stratified flow, the liquid holdup is relatively low and depends on the liquid level in the pipeline
In slug flow, the liquid holdup is higher due to the presence of liquid slugs, which occupy a larger portion of the pipeline volume
Annular flow typically has a lower liquid holdup compared to slug flow, with the liquid phase flowing as a film along the pipeline wall
Liquid holdup prediction methods
Accurate prediction of liquid holdup is crucial for the design and operation of multiphase pipelines, as it affects the pressure gradient, , and corrosion management
Empirical correlations, such as the Beggs-Brill correlation and the , are widely used to estimate liquid holdup based on flow conditions and fluid properties
Mechanistic models, such as the drift-flux model and the , provide a more rigorous approach to predicting liquid holdup by considering the physical interactions between the phases
simulations can also be employed to predict liquid holdup, especially in complex pipeline geometries or flow conditions
Slug flow in multiphase pipelines
Slug flow characteristics and behavior
Slug flow is characterized by the alternating flow of liquid slugs and gas pockets along the pipeline
Liquid slugs are regions of high liquid holdup that occupy most of the pipeline cross-section, while gas pockets are regions of high gas content with a stratified liquid layer at the bottom
Slug flow can occur in both horizontal and inclined pipelines, and its behavior is influenced by factors such as the gas and liquid velocities, fluid properties, and pipeline inclination
Slug length and frequency
Slug length refers to the distance between the front and tail of a liquid slug, and it can vary significantly depending on the flow conditions
Slug frequency is the number of slugs passing a given point in the pipeline per unit time
Predicting slug length and frequency is important for the design of slug catchers, separators, and other downstream equipment
Empirical correlations and mechanistic models, such as the Dukler-Hubbard model and the Zhang model, are used to estimate slug length and frequency based on flow parameters
Slug velocity and holdup
Slug velocity refers to the speed at which the liquid slugs travel along the pipeline
Slug holdup is the fraction of the pipeline volume occupied by the liquid slugs
The slug velocity is typically higher than the average velocity of the liquid phase, as the slugs are propelled by the expanding gas pockets behind them
Slug holdup depends on factors such as the slug length, the liquid holdup in the film region, and the gas in the slug body
Empirical correlations and mechanistic models are used to predict slug velocity and holdup based on flow conditions and fluid properties
Slug flow pressure gradient prediction
Predicting the pressure gradient in slug flow is essential for the design and operation of multiphase pipelines
The pressure gradient in slug flow is influenced by the gravitational, frictional, and accelerational components, as well as the characteristics of the liquid slugs and gas pockets
Empirical correlations, such as the Beggs-Brill correlation and the Mukherjee-Brill correlation, can be used to estimate the pressure gradient in slug flow
Mechanistic models, such as the unit cell model and the slug tracking model, provide a more detailed approach to predicting the pressure gradient by considering the dynamics of individual slugs and the interactions between the phases
Annular flow in multiphase pipelines
Annular flow characteristics and behavior
Annular flow is characterized by the presence of a continuous gas core flowing in the center of the pipeline, with a liquid film flowing along the pipeline wall
The liquid film can be smooth or wavy, depending on the gas and liquid velocities and the fluid properties
Annular flow typically occurs at high gas velocities and is common in vertical and inclined pipelines, as well as in the later stages of horizontal pipeline flow
Liquid film thickness and distribution
The thickness of the liquid film in annular flow varies along the pipeline circumference, with the film being thicker at the bottom due to gravitational effects
The distribution of the liquid film is influenced by factors such as the gas velocity, liquid flow rate, and pipeline inclination
Predicting the and distribution is important for understanding the heat transfer, mass transfer, and corrosion behavior in annular flow
Empirical correlations and mechanistic models, such as the Asali model and the Alves model, are used to estimate the liquid film thickness and distribution based on flow conditions and fluid properties
Entrainment in annular flow
refers to the process by which liquid droplets are torn from the liquid film and carried by the gas core in annular flow
The degree of entrainment depends on factors such as the gas velocity, liquid film thickness, and fluid properties (surface tension and viscosity)
Entrainment can have significant effects on the pressure gradient, heat transfer, and corrosion in annular flow
Empirical correlations, such as the Ishii-Mishima correlation and the Sawant correlation, are used to predict the entrainment fraction based on flow conditions and fluid properties
Annular flow pressure gradient prediction
Predicting the pressure gradient in annular flow is essential for the design and operation of multiphase pipelines
The pressure gradient in annular flow is influenced by the gravitational, frictional, and accelerational components, as well as the characteristics of the liquid film and the gas core
Empirical correlations, such as the Lockhart-Martinelli correlation and the Friedel correlation, can be used to estimate the pressure gradient in annular flow
Mechanistic models, such as the two-fluid model and the film thickness model, provide a more detailed approach to predicting the pressure gradient by considering the interactions between the liquid film and the gas core
Stratified flow in multiphase pipelines
Stratified flow characteristics and behavior
Stratified flow occurs when the gas and liquid phases flow separately, with the liquid flowing at the bottom of the pipeline and the gas flowing above it
Stratified flow is common in horizontal and slightly inclined pipelines, particularly at low gas and liquid velocities
The interface between the gas and liquid phases can be smooth (stratified smooth flow) or wavy (stratified wavy flow), depending on the relative velocities of the phases and the fluid properties
Liquid level and interface shape
The liquid level in stratified flow refers to the height of the liquid phase in the pipeline cross-section
The shape of the gas-liquid interface depends on factors such as the gas and liquid flow rates, the fluid properties, and the pipeline inclination
Predicting the liquid level and interface shape is important for understanding the pressure gradient, flow stability, and heat transfer in stratified flow
Empirical correlations and mechanistic models, such as the Taitel-Dukler model and the Shoham-Taitel model, are used to estimate the liquid level and interface shape based on flow conditions and fluid properties
Stability of stratified flow
Stratified flow can become unstable and transition to other flow regimes, such as slug flow or annular flow, under certain conditions
The stability of stratified flow depends on factors such as the gas and liquid velocities, the fluid properties, and the pipeline geometry
Instability in stratified flow can be caused by the growth of interfacial waves, leading to the formation of slugs or the entrainment of liquid in the gas phase
Stability criteria, such as the Kelvin-Helmholtz criterion and the Taitel-Dukler criterion, are used to predict the conditions under which stratified flow becomes unstable
Stratified flow pressure gradient prediction
Predicting the pressure gradient in stratified flow is essential for the design and operation of multiphase pipelines
The pressure gradient in stratified flow is influenced by the gravitational and frictional components, as well as the characteristics of the gas and liquid phases
Empirical correlations, such as the Lockhart-Martinelli correlation and the Chisholm correlation, can be used to estimate the pressure gradient in stratified flow
Mechanistic models, such as the two-fluid model and the interface friction model, provide a more detailed approach to predicting the pressure gradient by considering the interactions between the gas and liquid phases
Dispersed bubble flow in multiphase pipelines
Dispersed bubble flow characteristics
Dispersed bubble flow occurs when small gas bubbles are uniformly distributed in a continuous liquid phase
This flow regime is common in vertical and inclined pipelines, particularly at high liquid velocities and low gas velocities
The behavior of dispersed bubble flow is influenced by factors such as the bubble size distribution, bubble velocity, and fluid properties
Bubble size distribution and coalescence
The size distribution of bubbles in dispersed bubble flow can vary depending on the flow conditions and fluid properties
Bubble coalescence, which is the merging of smaller bubbles into larger ones, can occur due to factors such as turbulence, bubble collisions, and wake interactions
Predicting the bubble size distribution and coalescence is important for understanding the mass transfer, heat transfer, and flow behavior in dispersed bubble flow
Empirical correlations and population balance models are used to estimate the bubble size distribution and coalescence rates based on flow conditions and fluid properties
Bubble velocity and holdup
Bubble velocity refers to the speed at which the gas bubbles travel in the liquid phase
Bubble holdup is the fraction of the pipeline volume occupied by the gas bubbles
The bubble velocity is influenced by factors such as the liquid velocity, bubble size, and fluid properties (density and viscosity)
Bubble holdup depends on the gas flow rate, bubble velocity, and bubble size distribution
Empirical correlations and mechanistic models, such as the drift-flux model and the two-fluid model, are used to predict bubble velocity and holdup based on flow conditions and fluid properties
Dispersed bubble flow pressure gradient
Predicting the pressure gradient in dispersed bubble flow is essential for the design and operation of multiphase pipelines
The pressure gradient in dispersed bubble flow is influenced by the gravitational, frictional, and accelerational components, as well as the characteristics of the gas bubbles and the liquid phase
Empirical correlations, such as the Lockhart-Martinelli correlation and the Friedel correlation, can be used to estimate the pressure gradient in dispersed bubble flow
Mechanistic models, such as the homogeneous flow model and the drift-flux model, provide a more detailed approach to predicting the pressure gradient by considering the interactions between the gas bubbles and the liquid phase
Modeling multiphase flow in pipelines
Empirical correlations for multiphase flow
Empirical correlations are based on experimental data and provide simple, quick estimates of multiphase flow parameters such as pressure gradient, liquid holdup, and flow pattern transitions
Common empirical correlations for multiphase flow include the Lockhart-Martinelli correlation, the Beggs-Brill correlation, and the Mukherjee-Brill correlation
These correlations are often limited to the range of conditions under which the experimental data were obtained and may not accurately capture the complex physics of multiphase flow
Mechanistic models for multiphase flow
Mechanistic models are based on the fundamental physical principles governing multiphase flow, such as conservation of mass, momentum, and energy
These models provide a more rigorous and accurate approach to predicting multiphase flow behavior compared to empirical correlations
Examples of mechanistic models include the two-fluid model, the drift-flux model, and the slug flow model
Mechanistic models require a deeper understanding of the underlying physics and may involve more complex mathematical formulations and computational requirements
Computational fluid dynamics for multiphase flow
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is a powerful tool for simulating multiphase flow in pipelines, providing detailed information on flow patterns, phase distributions, and local flow parameters
CFD models solve the governing equations of fluid flow, such as the Navier-Stokes equations, using numerical methods like the finite volume or finite element method
Multiphase CFD models can capture complex flow phenomena, such as phase interactions, turbulence, and heat transfer, and can handle complex pipeline geometries and flow conditions
However, CFD simulations can be computationally expensive and require significant expertise in model setup, validation, and interpretation