8.5 Ricardian Equivalence

Ricardian equivalence challenges the idea that government borrowing stimulates the economy. It suggests consumers save more when the government borrows, anticipating future tax hikes. This offsets any boost from increased government spending or tax cuts.

The theory has big implications for fiscal policy. If true, it means government can't boost demand by borrowing and spending. But many economists question whether its assumptions hold up in the real world.

Ricardian Equivalence

Overview of Ricardian Equivalence Theory

Top images from around the web for Overview of Ricardian Equivalence Theory

• 

  Government Spending | Macroeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Ricardian Equivalence | Macroeconomics with Prof. Dolar View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Neoclassical School – Introduction to Macroeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Government Spending | Macroeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Ricardian Equivalence | Macroeconomics with Prof. Dolar View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Overview of Ricardian Equivalence Theory

• 

  Government Spending | Macroeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Ricardian Equivalence | Macroeconomics with Prof. Dolar View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Neoclassical School – Introduction to Macroeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Government Spending | Macroeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Ricardian Equivalence | Macroeconomics with Prof. Dolar View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Ricardian equivalence is an economic theory suggesting consumers internalize the government's budget constraint when making consumption decisions
• States that the method of financing government spending, whether through taxes or debt, does not affect consumer spending or national saving
• Under Ricardian equivalence, if the government finances spending through borrowing, consumers anticipate higher future taxes to repay the debt and therefore increase their savings by an equivalent amount
• Implies that government borrowing does not stimulate aggregate demand or economic growth because it is offset by higher private saving (crowding out effect)

Foundations of Ricardian Equivalence

• Based on the idea that consumers are forward-looking and make decisions based on their lifetime income rather than just their current disposable income
• Assumes that consumers have rational expectations about future government policies and their impact on the economy
• Builds on the permanent income hypothesis, which states that consumption is determined by average expected lifetime income rather than current income (Milton Friedman)
• Related to the concept of tax discounting, where consumers adjust their spending based on expected future tax liabilities

Assumptions of Ricardian Equivalence

Assumptions about Consumer Behavior

• Consumers are assumed to be rational, forward-looking, and able to anticipate future tax liabilities associated with current government borrowing
• Consumers are assumed to have a long-term planning horizon and make consumption decisions based on their expected lifetime income rather than just their current disposable income
• The theory assumes that consumers are not liquidity constrained and can adjust their saving and borrowing in response to changes in government fiscal policy
• Assumes that consumers have altruistic motives and care about the welfare of future generations, leading them to adjust their behavior to account for future tax burdens

Assumptions about the Economy and Government

• Capital markets are assumed to be perfect, allowing consumers to borrow and save freely at the same interest rate as the government
• Ricardian equivalence assumes that the government's budget constraint is known and that any borrowing will be paid back through future taxes
• The theory assumes that government spending is a perfect substitute for private spending and does not produce any additional benefits (e.g., public goods, positive externalities)
• Assumes that the government has a credible commitment to repaying its debt and that there is no risk of default or inflation eroding the value of the debt

Implications of Ricardian Equivalence for Fiscal Policy

Ineffectiveness of Fiscal Policy under Ricardian Equivalence

• If Ricardian equivalence holds, it has significant implications for the effectiveness of fiscal policy in stimulating aggregate demand and economic growth
• Under Ricardian equivalence, government borrowing to finance spending will not stimulate aggregate demand because consumers will increase their saving by an equivalent amount in anticipation of future tax liabilities
• Consequently, fiscal policy actions such as tax cuts or increased government spending will not have any real effect on economic activity if they are financed through borrowing (no Keynesian multiplier effect)

Timing and Burden of Taxes

• Ricardian equivalence suggests that the timing of taxes does not matter for consumption and saving decisions, only the present value of lifetime tax liabilities
• Implies that government debt is not a burden on future generations because consumers fully anticipate and adjust for future tax liabilities
• Challenges the conventional view that government debt imposes a burden on future generations by requiring higher taxes to service the debt (Barro-Ricardo equivalence theorem)

Policy Implications and Limitations

• If Ricardian equivalence holds, it suggests that fiscal policy is an ineffective tool for stabilizing the economy and stimulating growth during recessions
• Implies that the government should focus on long-term fiscal sustainability and tax smoothing rather than short-term demand management
• However, Ricardian equivalence relies on strong assumptions that may not hold in practice, such as perfect capital markets, rational expectations, and absence of liquidity constraints
• The presence of credit constraints, uncertainty about future policies, and non-altruistic behavior can limit the applicability of Ricardian equivalence in real-world policy-making

Empirical Evidence for vs Against Ricardian Equivalence

Studies Supporting Ricardian Equivalence

• Some empirical studies have found evidence consistent with Ricardian equivalence
• Increases in government borrowing are associated with higher private saving and no change in aggregate demand (Seater, 1993; Barro, 1974)
• Studies have found that consumers adjust their consumption and saving behavior in response to changes in government debt (Kormendi, 1983; Cardia, 1997)
• Research has shown that the impact of fiscal policy on interest rates and output is smaller than predicted by traditional Keynesian models (Evans, 1987; Plosser, 1987)

Evidence Against Ricardian Equivalence

• However, other studies have found that fiscal policy actions do have real effects on economic activity, contradicting the predictions of Ricardian equivalence
• Empirical evidence suggests that many consumers are liquidity constrained and do not have the ability to smooth their consumption over time in response to changes in fiscal policy (Campbell & Mankiw, 1989; Jappelli & Pistaferri, 2010)
• Studies have found that tax cuts and government spending increases can stimulate aggregate demand and economic growth, especially during recessions (Romer & Romer, 2010; Blanchard & Perotti, 2002)
• Research has shown that the degree of Ricardian equivalence may vary depending on factors such as the level of government debt, credibility of fiscal policy, and distribution of wealth (Sutherland, 1997; Nickel & Vansteenkiste, 2008)

Limitations and Criticisms of Ricardian Equivalence

• Critics argue that the assumptions underlying Ricardian equivalence, such as perfect capital markets and forward-looking consumers, are unrealistic and do not hold in practice
• The presence of borrowing constraints, uncertainty about future policies, and myopic behavior can limit the applicability of Ricardian equivalence (Bernheim, 1987; Mankiw, 2000)
• Some studies have found that consumers do not fully internalize the government's budget constraint and may not adjust their behavior in response to changes in fiscal policy (Smetters, 1999; Gale & Orszag, 2003)
• The evidence suggests that while Ricardian equivalence may hold to some degree, it is not a complete description of how consumers respond to fiscal policy actions in practice