You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides
You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides

8.1 Sources of Power in Negotiations

3 min readjuly 23, 2024

Power in negotiations comes from various sources, shaping how deals unfold. From formal authority to personal charm, negotiators tap into different types of power to gain an edge. Understanding these power dynamics is key to navigating complex talks and achieving favorable outcomes.

Leverage in negotiations stems from information, expertise, and relationships. A strong boosts bargaining power, while and can shift the balance. Recognizing and strategically using these sources of power can make or break a deal.

Sources of Power in Negotiations

Types of negotiation power

Top images from around the web for Types of negotiation power
Top images from around the web for Types of negotiation power
    • Derives from formal authority or rank within an organization (CEO, manager)
    • Grants control over resources, rewards, or punishments (budget allocation, promotions)
    • Stems from access to or control over valuable information (market data, customer insights)
    • Relies on expertise or specialized knowledge in a specific domain (legal, technical)
    • Built through strong interpersonal connections and networks (long-term business partnerships)
    • Enables influence through trust and rapport (personal recommendations, referrals)
    • Emanates from individual charisma, confidence, and persuasiveness (public speaking skills)
    • Allows inspiring and motivating others to take desired actions (rallying team support)
    • Arises from situational factors that provide leverage (market demand, competition)
    • Exploits scarcity of alternatives or time pressure to gain an advantage (limited supplier options, tight deadlines)

Sources of negotiation leverage

    • Possessing access to data, facts, or insights that others lack (proprietary research, insider knowledge)
    • Strategically using information to influence outcomes and shape perceptions (presenting compelling evidence, highlighting risks)
    • Holding specialized knowledge or skills in a relevant field (technical expertise, industry experience)
    • Being recognized as an authority or thought leader in a specific domain (published author, keynote speaker)
    • Cultivating strong interpersonal connections with key stakeholders (long-standing client relationships)
    • Building trust and rapport with negotiation counterparts through empathy and active listening
    • Leveraging networks to gather valuable information and garner support (seeking advice from mentors, rallying allies)

Impact of BATNA on power

  • BATNA (Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement) represents the best available option if no agreement is reached
  • A strong BATNA enhances bargaining power by providing a viable alternative (having multiple job offers when negotiating salary)
  • A weak or non-existent BATNA reduces bargaining power and increases dependence on the negotiation outcome (lacking other suppliers when negotiating a contract)
  • Knowing your own and the other party's BATNA is crucial for assessing relative bargaining power and setting realistic expectations
  • Improving your BATNA, such as by developing new options or strengthening existing alternatives, can increase your bargaining power and confidence in negotiations

Scarcity and time in power dynamics

  • Scarcity
    • Limited availability of resources, options, or alternatives creates a sense of urgency and competition (rare raw materials, unique expertise)
    • Increases the perceived value and desirability of the scarce item, giving the controlling party more leverage (exclusive distribution rights)
    • Enhances the power of the party controlling the scarce resource, as others become more dependent on them (sole supplier of a critical component)
  • Time pressure
    • Deadlines or time constraints that limit the negotiation window (expiring contracts, product launch dates)
    • Creates a sense of urgency and can lead to concessions or hasty decisions (accepting less favorable terms to meet a deadline)
    • Favors the party with more flexibility or less time sensitivity, as they can use time pressure to their advantage (extending negotiations to wear down the other party)
  1. The combination of scarcity and time pressure can significantly shift power dynamics in negotiations
  2. The party with control over scarce resources and less time pressure holds more power (vendor with exclusive access to a critical input and no pressing deadlines)
  3. The party facing scarcity and high time pressure may feel compelled to make concessions to secure the needed resources before time runs out (manufacturer needing a rare component to meet a production deadline)
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Glossary