9.2 The Divided Line: levels of knowledge and reality

Plato's Divided Line theory explores the levels of knowledge and reality, connecting to the Allegory of the Cave. It presents a four-tiered structure, from shadows to physical objects to mathematical concepts to pure Forms, showing how we progress from opinion to true knowledge.

This theory divides reality into visible and intelligible realms, with the latter being superior. It ties into Plato's Theory of Forms, suggesting that true understanding comes from grasping abstract concepts rather than relying on sensory experiences.

Levels of Knowledge and Reality

Four-Tiered Structure of Reality and Cognition

Top images from around the web for Four-Tiered Structure of Reality and Cognition

• 

  Sociology of knowledge - Wikiquote View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  DIKW pyramid - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  A Map of Reality – Thy Mind, O Human View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Sociology of knowledge - Wikiquote View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  DIKW pyramid - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Four-Tiered Structure of Reality and Cognition

• 

  Sociology of knowledge - Wikiquote View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  DIKW pyramid - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  A Map of Reality – Thy Mind, O Human View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Sociology of knowledge - Wikiquote View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  DIKW pyramid - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Divided Line analogy presents hierarchical structure of reality and corresponding modes of cognition
• Four distinct levels represent progression from opinion to knowledge
• Each level corresponds to specific type of object and cognitive faculty
• Proportions of line segments significant encompass and surpass lower levels in clarity and truth

Levels of the Divided Line

• Eikasia (imagination) represents realm of images, shadows, and reflections
  • Least reliable form of knowledge
  • Examples include reflections in water, shadows on cave walls
• Pistis (belief) pertains to physical objects and natural world
  • More stable but still limited form of understanding
  • Examples include trees, animals, everyday objects
• Dianoia (mathematical reasoning) involves abstract thinking and deductive reasoning
  • Particularly applied in mathematics and geometry
  • Examples include geometric proofs, mathematical formulas
• Noesis (philosophical understanding) represents realm of pure Forms
  • Highest form of knowledge achievable through dialectic
  • Examples include concepts of justice, beauty, goodness

Visible vs Intelligible Realms

Characteristics of Visible and Intelligible Realms

• Divided Line primarily split into two main sections visible realm (horaton) and intelligible realm (noeton)
• Visible realm encompasses physical world perceived through senses
  • Includes images (eikasia) and physical objects (pistis)
  • Associated with doxa (opinion)
  • Examples include shadows, reflections, trees, buildings
• Intelligible realm represents abstract concepts and ideas grasped by intellect
  • Includes mathematical objects (dianoia) and Forms (noesis)
  • Associated with episteme (knowledge)
  • Examples include mathematical theorems, concept of justice

Relationship and Transition Between Realms

• Transition from visible to intelligible realm marks shift from particular instances to universal concepts
• Move from sensory perception to rational cognition
• Intelligible realm considered superior in terms of truth and clarity
  • Deals with unchanging and eternal entities rather than mutable phenomena
• Reflects Plato's metaphysical dualism
  • Distinguishes between world of appearances and world of true reality
• Examples of transition include moving from observing specific triangles to understanding the concept of triangularity

Divided Line and Theory of Forms

Representation of Ontological and Epistemological Hierarchy

• Divided Line serves as visual representation of Plato's ontological and epistemological hierarchy
• Theory of Forms positioned at apex of Divided Line
• Highest level (noesis) corresponds directly to apprehension of Forms
  • Plato considers Forms most real and knowable entities
• Lower levels represent varying degrees of participation in or reflection of Forms
  • Physical objects imperfect copies of Forms
  • Images further removed from Forms
• Examples include physical beauty as imperfect reflection of Form of Beauty

Progression and Knowledge Acquisition

• Progression up Divided Line mirrors ascent towards knowledge of Forms in Plato's philosophy
• Movement from sensory perception to abstract reasoning to direct intellectual intuition
• Forms serve as foundation for all knowledge and reality
  • Each lower level derives existence and intelligibility from level above
• True knowledge (episteme) attained only through understanding Forms
• Opinion (doxa) limited to visible realm
• Examples include moving from observing just actions to understanding the Form of Justice

Epistemological and Ontological Implications

Epistemological Considerations

• Hierarchical structure of knowledge with different cognitive faculties corresponding to levels of reality and certainty
• True knowledge (episteme) only possible in intelligible realm particularly at level of Forms
• Challenges reliability of sensory perception and empirical observation
• Suggests correspondence between degrees of reality and degrees of knowability
• Implies absolute truth attainable only through philosophical reasoning and dialectic
• Examples include questioning reliability of sense-based knowledge vs abstract reasoning

Ontological Implications

• Graduated scale of reality with Forms at highest level being most real
• Images or shadows at lowest level being least real
• Reinforces Plato's metaphysical dualism
  • Fundamental distinction between changeable world of appearances and eternal realm of Forms
• Challenges conventional notions of reality
  • Suggests abstract concepts (Forms) more real than physical objects
• Influences subsequent philosophical debates on idealism and realism
• Examples include considering whether the concept of "chairness" more real than individual chairs