You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides
You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides

9.3 Impact of processing conditions on device performance

2 min readjuly 25, 2024

Film deposition techniques shape organic photovoltaic performance. , , and create thin films with varying thickness control and scalability. affects and , impacting and .

Solvents and processing conditions influence heterojunction morphology. Solvent properties, , and affect and . Post-processing techniques like and optimize and , enhancing charge carrier mobility and device efficiency.

Film Deposition and Morphology

Film deposition techniques for photovoltaics

Top images from around the web for Film deposition techniques for photovoltaics
Top images from around the web for Film deposition techniques for photovoltaics
  • Spin coating rapidly rotates substrate spreading solution uniformly creating thin films through centrifugal force and fast solvent evaporation affecting crystallization (nanometer-scale thickness control)
  • Blade coating moves blade to spread solution allowing slower process with more control over film thickness enabling large-area fabrication (meter-scale roll-to-roll processing)
  • Ink-jet printing precisely deposits droplets enabling patterned films and multi-layer structures with droplet size and spacing impacting film uniformity (micrometer-scale resolution)
  • Deposition speed influences molecular orientation and film uniformity affecting charge transport while crystallinity and domain size impact exciton dissociation (polymer alignment, fullerene aggregation)

Solvents and morphology in heterojunctions

  • affects influencing polymer-fullerene mixing and phase separation dynamics (chlorobenzene, dichlorobenzene)
  • Temperature and humidity alter film formation process and drying rate impacting phase separation dynamics (20-80℃, 30-70% RH)
  • Solvent evaporation drives phase separation promoting polymer and fullerene self-organization with domain size and purity affecting charge generation and transport (10-20 nm optimal domains)

Post-Processing and Device Architecture

Post-processing for device optimization

  • Thermal annealing increases polymer crystallinity promoting phase separation in bulk heterojunction and optimizing domain size for efficient charge transport (100-150℃)
  • Solvent vapor annealing increases without high temperatures allowing reorganization of polymer and fullerene phases leading to favorable morphologies for charge separation (chloroform, toluene vapors)
  • Post-processing enhances charge carrier mobility improves exciton dissociation at interfaces and creates better contact between active layer and electrodes (2-10x mobility increase)

Architecture impact on photovoltaic efficiency

  • affects light absorption and charge collection requiring balance between absorption and transport (optimal range 100-300 nm)
  • Device architectures include:
    1. Conventional (ITO/PEDOT:PSS/Active Layer/ETL/Metal)
    2. Inverted (ITO/ETL/Active Layer/HTL/Metal)
    3. for improved spectral coverage
  • enhance charge extraction (ZnO, TiOx for electrons; MoO3, V2O5 for holes)
  • depends on absorption and charge collection while affected by energy levels and recombination (JSC ∝ absorption, VOC ∝ HOMO-LUMO difference)
  • influenced by series and shunt resistances (ideal FF > 0.75)
  • prevents oxygen and moisture ingress while improve electrode stability (glass, flexible barriers)
  • Material choice impacts long-term (fullerene-free acceptors, crosslinkable polymers)
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Glossary