You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides
You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides

is a cornerstone of atmospheric boundary layer physics. It provides a framework for understanding turbulent flows near the Earth's surface, using dimensional analysis to describe vertical turbulence structure.

The theory assumes a homogeneous surface layer with constant fluxes and negligible Coriolis effects. It uses dimensionless groups to construct universal functions, leading to the and stability corrections for non-neutral conditions.

Fundamentals of Monin-Obukhov theory

  • Monin-Obukhov similarity theory provides a framework for understanding turbulent flows in the atmospheric surface layer
  • Applies dimensional analysis to describe the vertical structure of turbulence near the Earth's surface
  • Forms the basis for many boundary layer parameterizations used in atmospheric models

Key assumptions

Top images from around the web for Key assumptions
Top images from around the web for Key assumptions
  • Surface layer is horizontally homogeneous with constant fluxes
  • Turbulent fluxes dominate over molecular diffusion
  • Coriolis force effects are negligible in the surface layer
  • Flow is statistically stationary over the averaging period
  • Assumes a flat, uniform surface with no obstacles

Dimensional analysis approach

  • Uses Buckingham Pi theorem to derive dimensionless groups
  • Identifies relevant physical parameters (friction velocity, buoyancy flux, height)
  • Constructs universal functions based on dimensionless ratios
  • Leads to logarithmic wind profile in neutral conditions
  • Incorporates stability corrections for non-neutral atmospheres

Obukhov length scale

  • Fundamental length scale in Monin-Obukhov theory
  • Defined as L=u3κ(g/θv)H0/ρcpL = -\frac{u_*^3}{\kappa(g/\theta_v)H_0/\rho c_p}
  • Represents the height where buoyancy production equals shear production
  • Negative values indicate unstable conditions, positive values stable conditions
  • Magnitude indicates the strength of stability effects
    • Large |L| suggests near-neutral conditions
    • Small |L| indicates strong stability influence

Similarity functions

  • Describe how atmospheric variables deviate from neutral conditions
  • Express turbulent fluxes and gradients as functions of z/L
  • Enable prediction of vertical profiles in the surface layer

Momentum similarity function

  • Denoted as ϕm(z/L), describes in non-neutral conditions
  • Approaches 1 in neutral conditions (z/L → 0)
  • Decreases in unstable conditions (z/L < 0) due to enhanced mixing
  • Increases in stable conditions (z/L > 0) due to suppressed turbulence
  • Often expressed as ϕm(z/L) = (1 - αz/L)^-β for unstable conditions

Heat similarity function

  • Represented by ϕh(z/L), describes temperature gradient in non-neutral conditions
  • Approaches (≈ 0.74) in neutral conditions
  • Decreases more rapidly than ϕm in unstable conditions
  • Increases more steeply than ϕm in stable conditions
  • Can be expressed as ϕh(z/L) = β(1 - γz/L)^-1/2 for unstable conditions

Moisture similarity function

  • Denoted as ϕq(z/L), describes water vapor gradient in non-neutral conditions
  • Generally assumed to be equal to ϕh(z/L) in most applications
  • Reflects similarity between heat and moisture transport in turbulent flows
  • May deviate from ϕh in very stable or unstable conditions
  • Crucial for estimating evaporation and latent heat fluxes

Stability parameters

  • Quantify the relative importance of buoyancy and shear in turbulence production
  • Used to classify atmospheric stability and determine appropriate similarity functions
  • Essential for parameterizing turbulent fluxes in numerical models

Richardson number

  • Dimensionless ratio of buoyancy to shear production of turbulence
  • Gradient defined as Ri=gθθ/z(U/z)2Ri = \frac{g}{\theta}\frac{\partial\theta/\partial z}{(\partial U/\partial z)^2}
  • Negative values indicate unstable conditions, positive values stable conditions
  • Critical value (Ri ≈ 0.25) often used as threshold for turbulence suppression
  • Difficult to measure directly due to required vertical gradient measurements

Bulk Richardson number

  • Simplified version of Richardson number using finite differences
  • Calculated as RiB=gΔzΔθθ(ΔU)2Ri_B = \frac{g\Delta z\Delta\theta}{\theta(\Delta U)^2}
  • Easier to compute from standard meteorological measurements
  • Used in many numerical weather prediction models
  • May not accurately represent local stability in strongly stratified layers

Flux Richardson number

  • Ratio of buoyancy flux to shear production of turbulent kinetic energy
  • Defined as Rif=(g/θ)wθuwU/zRi_f = \frac{(g/\theta)\overline{w'\theta'}}{\overline{u'w'}\partial U/\partial z}
  • Directly related to turbulent fluxes rather than mean gradients
  • More physically relevant for describing turbulence dynamics
  • Challenging to measure due to required eddy covariance measurements

Flux-profile relationships

  • Connect turbulent fluxes to mean vertical gradients in the surface layer
  • Form the basis for estimating surface fluxes from routine meteorological measurements
  • Incorporate stability corrections through universal functions

Momentum flux profile

  • Relates to wind speed gradient
  • Expressed as κzuUz=ϕm(z/L)\frac{\kappa z}{u_*}\frac{\partial U}{\partial z} = \phi_m(z/L)
  • Integrates to logarithmic wind profile with stability correction
  • Used to estimate surface stress and friction velocity
  • Crucial for modeling wind profiles in the atmospheric boundary layer

Heat flux profile

  • Connects to potential temperature gradient
  • Given by κzθθz=ϕh(z/L)\frac{\kappa z}{\theta_*}\frac{\partial \theta}{\partial z} = \phi_h(z/L)
  • Integrates to logarithmic temperature profile with stability correction
  • Allows estimation of surface sensible
  • Important for understanding thermal structure of the boundary layer

Moisture flux profile

  • Links water vapor flux to specific humidity gradient
  • Formulated as κzqqz=ϕq(z/L)\frac{\kappa z}{q_*}\frac{\partial q}{\partial z} = \phi_q(z/L)
  • Assumes similarity between heat and moisture transport
  • Enables estimation of surface latent heat flux and evaporation
  • Critical for modeling water vapor distribution and cloud formation

Surface layer scaling

  • Provides characteristic scales for velocity, temperature, and moisture in the surface layer
  • Allows normalization of turbulent quantities for universal representation
  • Facilitates comparison of measurements from different sites and conditions

Velocity scales

  • Friction velocity (u*) serves as primary velocity scale
  • Defined as u=uwu_* = \sqrt{-\overline{u'w'}}
  • Represents intensity of turbulent momentum transport
  • Used to normalize wind speed profiles and turbulence statistics
  • Typically ranges from 0.1 to 1 m/s in the atmospheric surface layer

Temperature scales

  • Temperature scale (θ*) characterizes turbulent heat transport
  • Defined as θ=wθ/u\theta_* = -\overline{w'\theta'}/u_*
  • Used to normalize temperature profiles and heat flux measurements
  • Negative in unstable conditions, positive in stable conditions
  • Magnitude typically ranges from 0.01 to 1 K in the surface layer

Moisture scales

  • Specific humidity scale (q*) represents turbulent moisture transport
  • Defined analogously to temperature scale: q=wq/uq_* = -\overline{w'q'}/u_*
  • Used to normalize humidity profiles and latent heat flux measurements
  • Positive for upward moisture flux (evaporation), negative for downward flux
  • Magnitude depends on surface moisture availability and atmospheric conditions

Limitations and extensions

  • Monin-Obukhov theory has known limitations in certain atmospheric conditions
  • Various extensions and modifications have been proposed to address these issues
  • Understanding these limitations critical for proper application of the theory

Validity in different conditions

  • Theory works best in near-neutral and moderately unstable conditions
  • Breaks down in strongly stable conditions (z/L > 1) due to intermittent turbulence
  • May not apply in very unstable conditions (free convection limit)
  • Assumes horizontal homogeneity, limiting applicability over complex terrain
  • Requires steady-state conditions, challenging in rapidly changing weather

Non-dimensional gradients

  • Universal functions may vary between sites and stability ranges
  • Different formulations proposed for stable and unstable conditions
  • Some researchers suggest separate functions for momentum, heat, and moisture
  • Ongoing debate about the exact form of stability functions in very stable conditions
  • Recent studies explore non-local effects on gradient-flux relationships

Roughness sublayer effects

  • Theory assumes measurements above the roughness sublayer
  • Roughness sublayer depth varies with surface characteristics (typically 2-5 times canopy height)
  • Additional corrections needed for flux-profile relationships within roughness sublayer
  • Affects flux footprint calculations and interpretation of near-surface measurements
  • Important consideration for flux measurements over forests and urban areas

Applications in atmospheric modeling

  • Monin-Obukhov theory forms the basis for many surface layer parameterizations
  • Widely used in numerical weather prediction and climate models
  • Enables estimation of surface fluxes from routine meteorological observations

Boundary layer parameterization

  • Provides lower boundary conditions for planetary boundary layer schemes
  • Used to calculate surface drag, heat flux, and moisture flux
  • Incorporates stability-dependent eddy diffusivity profiles
  • Influences vertical mixing and turbulent transport throughout the boundary layer
  • Critical for accurate representation of near-surface weather conditions

Surface flux estimation

  • Allows calculation of momentum, heat, and moisture fluxes from standard measurements
  • Utilizes bulk aerodynamic formulas based on Monin-Obukhov similarity
  • Requires input of surface and stability functions
  • Widely used in agricultural meteorology and hydrology applications
  • Forms basis for evapotranspiration estimation in land surface models

Turbulence closure schemes

  • Provides scaling relationships for higher-order turbulence closure models
  • Used to parameterize turbulent kinetic energy and dissipation rate profiles
  • Informs eddy viscosity and diffusivity formulations in k-ε and k-ω models
  • Helps constrain turbulence length scales in mixing length approaches
  • Crucial for representing subgrid-scale processes in large-scale atmospheric models

Experimental validation

  • Extensive efforts to validate Monin-Obukhov theory through various experimental approaches
  • Combination of field measurements, laboratory studies, and numerical simulations
  • Ongoing research to refine and extend the theory based on observational evidence

Field measurements

  • Eddy covariance techniques used to directly measure turbulent fluxes
  • Flux-gradient methods employed to test similarity functions
  • Tall tower measurements provide vertical profiles in the surface layer
  • Aircraft observations used to study spatial variability and heterogeneity effects
  • Long-term datasets (FLUXNET, AmeriFlux) enable validation across diverse ecosystems

Wind tunnel studies

  • Controlled experiments to isolate specific processes and parameters
  • Allow systematic variation of stability conditions and surface characteristics
  • Used to study roughness sublayer effects and complex terrain influences
  • Provide detailed measurements of turbulence statistics and spectra
  • Help validate similarity functions and flux-profile relationships

Large eddy simulations

  • Numerical experiments to study surface layer dynamics at high resolution
  • Enable investigation of processes difficult to measure in the field
  • Used to test assumptions of horizontal homogeneity and constant flux layer
  • Provide insights into non-local effects and internal boundary layer development
  • Help refine parameterizations for coarser-resolution atmospheric models

Monin-Obukhov vs other theories

  • Monin-Obukhov theory complements and extends other approaches to boundary layer turbulence
  • Important to understand relationships and differences between various theoretical frameworks
  • Each approach has strengths and limitations for different applications

Comparison with K-theory

  • K-theory assumes downgradient diffusion with constant or height-dependent eddy diffusivity
  • Monin-Obukhov theory provides stability-dependent scaling for eddy diffusivity
  • K-theory simpler to implement but lacks universal applicability across stability ranges
  • Monin-Obukhov approach captures non-local effects through similarity functions
  • Hybrid approaches combine K-theory with Monin-Obukhov scaling in some models

Relation to mixing length theory

  • Mixing length theory assumes turbulent eddies have characteristic length scale
  • Monin-Obukhov theory incorporates stability effects on effective mixing length
  • Obukhov length serves as stability-dependent limit on mixing length in stable conditions
  • Mixing length approaches often use Monin-Obukhov scaling in the surface layer
  • Both theories contribute to development of more advanced turbulence closure schemes

Recent developments

  • Ongoing research continues to refine and extend Monin-Obukhov similarity theory
  • New approaches address limitations and expand applicability to complex conditions
  • Incorporation of advanced measurement techniques and high-resolution modeling

Non-local effects

  • Recognition of importance of large-scale eddies in unstable conditions
  • Development of convective velocity scale and mixed-layer similarity
  • Inclusion of entrainment effects at the top of the boundary layer
  • Exploration of non-local flux-gradient relationships in strongly unstable conditions
  • Incorporation of top-down and bottom-up diffusion concepts

Heterogeneous surfaces

  • Extension of theory to account for surface heterogeneity and patchiness
  • Development of blending height concept for transitions between surface types
  • Study of internal boundary layer development over changing surface conditions
  • Incorporation of footprint models to interpret flux measurements over heterogeneous terrain
  • Exploration of mosaic approaches for subgrid-scale surface variability in models

Stable boundary layer modifications

  • Recognition of limitations of traditional theory in very stable conditions
  • Development of z-less scaling for strongly stable stratification
  • Incorporation of intermittency and non-stationarity in flux-profile relationships
  • Exploration of anisotropic turbulence effects in stable boundary layers
  • Investigation of low-level jets and their impact on surface layer structure
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Glossary