9.2 Moral hazard and principal-agent problems

Moral hazard and principal-agent problems are key concepts in asymmetric information. They occur when one party has more info or less risk, leading to behaviors that benefit them at the expense of others.

These issues can cause market inefficiencies and distortions. To combat them, we use incentives, monitoring, and contracts to align interests and reduce information gaps between parties.

Moral hazard and principal-agent problems

Defining key concepts

Top images from around the web for Defining key concepts

• 

  Open Textbooks of the Day: Economics – BCcampus View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Principles of Microeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Principles of Microeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Open Textbooks of the Day: Economics – BCcampus View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Principles of Microeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Defining key concepts

• 

  Open Textbooks of the Day: Economics – BCcampus View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Principles of Microeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Principles of Microeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Open Textbooks of the Day: Economics – BCcampus View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Principles of Microeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Moral hazard describes individuals taking greater risks or behaving less carefully when protected from consequences
• Principal-agent problems occur when one party (agent) acts for another (principal) with misaligned interests
• Asymmetric information underlies both issues, with one party having more or better information
• Agents in moral hazard situations can take actions unobservable or costly for principals to monitor
• Principal-agent problems involve hidden actions or information, creating potential conflicts of interest
• Moral hazard examples include insurance markets (insured taking more risks) and corporate governance (managers not prioritizing shareholder interests)

Information asymmetry and behavioral impacts

• Asymmetric information allows agents to act in self-interest at principal's expense
• Insurance or protection can lead to riskier agent behavior (ex-ante moral hazard)
• Ex-post moral hazard reduces agent incentive to mitigate losses after adverse events
• Unobservable actions enable agents to exert less effort or make suboptimal choices for principal
• Moral hazard severity depends on information asymmetry degree and incentive alignment
• Rational agents weigh potential benefits against probability of detection or penalties
• Agents may strategically exploit information asymmetries to maximize personal utility

Agent incentives in moral hazard

Risk-taking and effort levels

• Protected agents tend to engage in riskier behaviors (skydiving after getting life insurance)
• Effort reduction occurs when actions are unobservable (employee slacking off when manager is away)
• Agents calculate risk-reward tradeoffs based on protection levels (risky investments with bailout expectations)
• Moral hazard can lead to overutilization of resources (unnecessary medical tests with comprehensive health insurance)
• Risk-shifting behavior transfers potential losses to principals (bank executives making high-risk loans)

Strategic behavior and information manipulation

• Agents may withhold or distort information to their advantage (used car salesmen concealing vehicle defects)
• Cream-skimming involves selecting only low-risk clients or tasks (insurance companies avoiding high-risk applicants)
• Agents can exploit contractual loopholes for personal gain (executives manipulating performance metrics for bonuses)
• Strategic timing of actions or disclosures can benefit agents (delaying bad news announcements until after bonus payouts)
• Information asymmetry enables agents to create artificial scarcity or urgency (real estate agents pressuring quick sales)

Impact of moral hazard on markets

Market inefficiencies and distortions

• Resource misallocation results from moral hazard (overinvestment in sectors with implicit government guarantees)
• Adverse selection occurs as high-risk individuals dominate certain markets (health insurance pools becoming riskier)
• Increased costs arise from accounting for potential agent misbehavior (higher insurance premiums)
• Welfare loss includes direct costs of suboptimal actions and indirect monitoring expenses
• Moral hazard can lead to reduced market options (limited insurance coverage for high-risk activities)
• Financial market moral hazard contributes to systemic risks (2008 financial crisis fueled by risky lending practices)
• Social costs extend beyond immediate parties (taxpayer-funded bailouts of "too big to fail" institutions)

Long-term market consequences

• Erosion of trust in market mechanisms (reduced faith in financial advisors after scandals)
• Regulatory overreach in response to moral hazard issues (complex compliance requirements increasing business costs)
• Market contraction or exit of low-risk participants (young healthy individuals forgoing health insurance)
• Innovation stifling due to risk aversion (reduced R&D investment in sectors with high liability concerns)
• Reputation damage to entire industries (public skepticism towards banking sector post-financial crisis)
• Moral hazard can create boom-bust cycles (housing market bubbles fueled by lax lending standards)

Aligning principal and agent interests

Incentive structures and compensation design

• Performance-based pay aligns agent incentives with principal objectives (sales commissions, stock options)
• Deferred compensation encourages long-term thinking (vesting schedules for equity grants)
• Balanced scorecards incorporate multiple performance metrics (customer satisfaction, financial results, innovation)
• Clawback provisions allow recovery of compensation for misconduct (executive bonuses tied to accurate financial reporting)
• Team-based incentives promote collaboration and reduce individual moral hazard (profit-sharing plans)

Monitoring and transparency mechanisms

• Implement robust reporting systems to reduce information asymmetries (real-time sales data for managers)
• Regular audits and inspections increase accountability (surprise quality checks in manufacturing)
• Technology enables enhanced monitoring capabilities (GPS tracking for delivery drivers)
• Whistleblower programs encourage reporting of misconduct (anonymous hotlines for employees)
• Open-book management increases transparency (sharing financial information with all employees)

Contractual and regulatory approaches

• Insurance deductibles and co-payments share risk with policyholders (health insurance copays for doctor visits)
• Performance clauses in contracts specify expected outcomes (service level agreements in IT contracts)
• Reputation mechanisms create long-term incentives for good behavior (online seller ratings on e-commerce platforms)
• Fiduciary duties legally obligate agents to act in principals' best interests (investment advisors' responsibilities to clients)
• Disclosure requirements increase transparency (public company financial reporting standards)
• Screening processes help select reliable agents (background checks and interviews for new hires)