9.1 Mountaintop removal mining

Mountaintop removal mining has drastically altered Appalachia's landscape and communities. This controversial coal extraction method involves blasting away mountain peaks, impacting over 500 mountains and 2,000 miles of streams in states like West Virginia and Kentucky.

The practice has severe environmental consequences, including deforestation, water pollution, and habitat loss. It also affects human health, with studies linking it to respiratory illnesses and birth defects. While providing some short-term economic benefits, mountaintop removal's long-term costs to communities and ecosystems are substantial.

Defining mountaintop removal mining

• Mountaintop removal (MTR) mining is a controversial coal extraction method used extensively in the Appalachian region of the United States
• Involves the removal of large amounts of rock and soil from mountain peaks to access underlying coal seams
• Overburden is typically dumped into adjacent valleys, creating valley fills that bury streams and alter the landscape

Process of MTR mining

Top images from around the web for Process of MTR mining

• 

  Category:Mountaintop removal mining - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  What is Mountaintop Removal? > Introduction ::: Journey Up Coal River View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Category:Mountaintop removal mining - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  What is Mountaintop Removal? > Introduction ::: Journey Up Coal River View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

Top images from around the web for Process of MTR mining

• 

  Category:Mountaintop removal mining - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  What is Mountaintop Removal? > Introduction ::: Journey Up Coal River View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Category:Mountaintop removal mining - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  What is Mountaintop Removal? > Introduction ::: Journey Up Coal River View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

• Begins with the clearing of vegetation and topsoil from the mountaintop using heavy machinery (bulldozers, excavators)
• Explosives are used to blast away rock and expose coal seams, often removing several hundred feet of elevation
• Coal is extracted using draglines, shovels, and trucks, while excess rock and soil are pushed into nearby valleys
• After coal removal, the site may undergo reclamation efforts to stabilize the land and replant vegetation, though the original contour is not restored

Extent of MTR in Appalachia

• MTR has been most prevalent in the central Appalachian states of West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia, and Tennessee
• Estimates suggest that over 500 mountains and 2,000 miles of streams have been impacted by MTR in the region
• The practice gained prominence in the 1970s and has continued despite growing environmental and public health concerns
• While MTR accounts for a significant portion of coal production in these states, it employs fewer workers compared to traditional underground mining

Environmental impacts

• MTR causes extensive and long-lasting damage to the natural environment of the Appalachian region
• The scale of land disturbance and alteration of topography is unparalleled in the history of coal mining

Deforestation and habitat loss

• Clearing of forests for MTR operations destroys habitats for numerous plant and animal species, many of which are endemic to the region
• Fragmentation of remaining forest patches reduces their ecological value and hinders wildlife movement
• Reclamation efforts often result in non-native grass and shrub cover rather than the restoration of diverse forest ecosystems
• Loss of forest cover also contributes to increased soil erosion and reduced carbon sequestration capacity

Water pollution and sedimentation

• Valley fills bury headwater streams, disrupting natural hydrology and aquatic habitats
• Runoff from exposed rock and soil increases sedimentation in downstream waterways, smothering aquatic life and altering stream morphology
• Leaching of heavy metals (selenium, manganese) and other pollutants from mine spoils degrades water quality
• Elevated levels of sulfates and total dissolved solids in streams draining MTR sites can harm aquatic organisms and impact drinking water supplies

Air pollution and dust

• Blasting, excavation, and transport of coal and overburden generate airborne particulate matter, including fine particles that pose health risks
• Coal dust from storage piles and processing facilities can contribute to air quality issues in nearby communities
• Explosives used in MTR release nitrogen oxides and other pollutants that can form ozone and contribute to acid rain
• Windblown dust from exposed rock surfaces and haul roads can settle on homes, crops, and water bodies

Increased risk of flooding

• Removal of vegetation and alteration of topography increase the speed and volume of surface runoff during rain events
• Valley fills can act as unstable dams, posing a risk of catastrophic failure and downstream flooding
• Increased frequency and severity of flash floods in MTR-affected watersheds threaten public safety and infrastructure
• Reduced infiltration capacity of reclaimed sites exacerbates flooding potential

Reduced biodiversity

• Destruction of forest habitats and aquatic ecosystems leads to declines in species richness and abundance
• Endemic and rare species, such as the Cerulean Warbler and the Big Sandy crayfish, are particularly vulnerable to MTR impacts
• Simplified post-mining landscapes support fewer species and less complex ecological communities
• Cumulative effects of multiple MTR sites across the region contribute to overall biodiversity loss in Appalachia

Human health effects

• Residents living near MTR sites face numerous health risks associated with environmental contamination and social disruption
• Studies have documented higher rates of certain illnesses and adverse health outcomes in MTR-affected communities compared to other Appalachian populations

Respiratory illnesses

• Exposure to airborne particulate matter and dust from MTR operations can exacerbate asthma and other respiratory conditions
• Elevated rates of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and black lung disease have been reported among coal miners and residents near MTR sites
• Increased prevalence of respiratory symptoms, such as coughing, wheezing, and shortness of breath, in MTR communities
• Children and elderly individuals are particularly susceptible to the respiratory impacts of air pollution

Birth defects and low birth weights

• Studies have found higher rates of birth defects, including heart, lung, and musculoskeletal abnormalities, in MTR counties compared to non-MTR counties
• Increased incidence of low birth weight and preterm births in areas with high MTR activity
• Maternal exposure to water and air pollutants from MTR may contribute to adverse birth outcomes
• Socioeconomic factors, such as poverty and limited access to prenatal care, can compound these risks

Cancer rates near MTR sites

• Some research suggests elevated rates of certain cancers, such as lung, colon, and bladder cancer, in MTR communities
• Exposure to toxic chemicals, such as heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), in water and air may increase cancer risk
• Limited access to cancer screening and treatment services in rural Appalachian areas may contribute to higher mortality rates
• More research is needed to establish causal links between MTR pollution and specific cancer types

Mental health and stress

• The environmental and social disruption caused by MTR can lead to increased stress, anxiety, and depression among affected residents
• Displacement of communities, loss of traditional livelihoods, and perceived powerlessness can contribute to mental health issues
• Noise pollution from blasting and heavy machinery can cause sleep disturbance and stress
• Stigma and social isolation associated with living in MTR-impacted areas may further exacerbate mental health problems

Economic considerations

• The economic impacts of MTR are complex and often contentious, with proponents emphasizing job creation and critics highlighting long-term costs and sustainability concerns
• Assessing the true costs and benefits of MTR requires considering both direct and indirect effects on local economies and the environment

Short-term economic benefits vs long-term costs

• MTR can provide short-term economic gains through increased coal production and job creation in the mining sector
• However, these benefits may be offset by long-term costs, such as environmental degradation, public health impacts, and reduced economic diversity
• The boom-and-bust nature of the coal industry leaves communities vulnerable to economic downturns and job losses
• Failure to account for externalities, such as water treatment costs and lost ecosystem services, can distort the perceived economic viability of MTR

Job creation in the coal industry

• MTR is often touted as a source of employment in economically distressed Appalachian communities
• However, the number of jobs created by MTR is relatively small compared to the scale of land disturbance and the size of the regional workforce
• Mechanization and automation in the mining industry have led to a decline in coal-related jobs over time, despite increased production
• Many MTR jobs are temporary and do not provide long-term economic stability for workers or communities

Reduced property values near MTR sites

• Proximity to MTR operations can significantly reduce property values due to environmental degradation, health risks, and aesthetic impacts
• Homeowners may face difficulty selling their properties or obtaining fair market value, leading to a loss of wealth and financial security
• Decreased property values can erode the local tax base, limiting funding for public services and infrastructure
• The stigma associated with living near MTR sites can further depress real estate markets and hinder economic development

Costs of environmental remediation

• The extensive environmental damage caused by MTR often requires costly remediation efforts to restore land and water resources
• Reclamation bonds posted by mining companies may be insufficient to cover the full costs of long-term restoration and monitoring
• Taxpayers may be left to bear the burden of cleaning up abandoned or inadequately reclaimed MTR sites
• The economic value of lost ecosystem services, such as clean water, biodiversity, and carbon sequestration, is rarely factored into remediation costs

Social and cultural impacts

• MTR profoundly affects the social fabric and cultural heritage of Appalachian communities, often leading to displacement, loss of traditional ways of life, and environmental justice concerns
• These impacts have sparked resistance and activism among residents, environmental groups, and civil society organizations

Displacement of communities

• MTR operations can lead to the forced displacement of entire communities, as homes and land are acquired or rendered uninhabitable by mining activities
• Residents may face pressure to sell their properties or have their land seized through eminent domain for mining purposes
• Displacement can sever social networks, disrupt family ties, and erode community cohesion
• Relocated individuals and families may struggle to adapt to new environments and maintain their cultural identities

Loss of traditional ways of life

• Appalachian communities have long relied on subsistence practices, such as hunting, fishing, foraging, and small-scale farming, which are threatened by MTR
• Destruction of forests and streams undermines the ability of residents to engage in these traditional activities and pass on cultural knowledge
• The loss of access to ancestral lands and sacred sites can erode cultural heritage and spiritual connections to the environment
• Displacement and environmental degradation can lead to the abandonment of traditional crafts, music, and other cultural practices

Environmental justice concerns

• MTR disproportionately affects low-income and marginalized communities in Appalachia, raising concerns about environmental justice and equity
• The burdens of environmental degradation, health risks, and economic disruption are often borne by those with the least power and resources to resist
• Limited access to decision-making processes and political influence can leave affected communities feeling voiceless and disempowered
• The concentration of MTR in Appalachia reflects broader patterns of environmental racism and the exploitation of rural, predominantly white communities

Resistance and activism against MTR

• Appalachian residents, environmental organizations, and grassroots groups have mobilized to resist MTR and advocate for sustainable alternatives
• Tactics have included public protests, lawsuits, media campaigns, and direct action to block mining operations
• Activists have sought to raise awareness about the impacts of MTR, pressure policymakers, and hold mining companies accountable
• Resistance efforts have faced challenges, including political opposition, corporate influence, and limited resources, but have also achieved some notable successes in curbing MTR

Regulatory and legal aspects

• The regulation of MTR involves a complex web of federal and state laws, agencies, and legal challenges
• Efforts to balance economic interests, environmental protection, and public health have led to ongoing debates and conflicts over the appropriate level of oversight and enforcement

Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act

• The Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA) of 1977 is the primary federal law governing coal mining, including MTR
• SMCRA establishes permitting requirements, environmental performance standards, and reclamation obligations for mining operations
• The law created the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE) to oversee state regulatory programs and enforce SMCRA provisions
• Critics argue that SMCRA's provisions are inadequate to address the unique impacts of MTR and that enforcement has been inconsistent and weak

Clean Water Act and valley fills

• The Clean Water Act (CWA) regulates the discharge of pollutants into U.S. waters, including streams and wetlands affected by MTR
• Section 404 of the CWA requires permits for the disposal of fill material, such as mining overburden, into waters of the United States
• The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has controversially issued permits for valley fills associated with MTR, arguing that they comply with CWA requirements
• Environmental groups have challenged these permits, contending that valley fills violate the CWA's mandate to maintain the integrity of the nation's waters

Lawsuits and legal challenges to MTR

• Numerous lawsuits have been filed by environmental organizations, community groups, and individuals to challenge MTR permits and practices
• These lawsuits have targeted mining companies, regulatory agencies, and policymakers, alleging violations of SMCRA, the CWA, and other environmental laws
• Some notable cases have resulted in temporary injunctions, permit revocations, and settlements requiring increased environmental mitigation and monitoring
• However, many legal challenges have faced setbacks in the courts, and the overall impact on MTR has been limited

State-level regulations and oversight

• While SMCRA sets federal minimum standards, states are primarily responsible for regulating coal mining within their borders
• State regulatory agencies issue permits, conduct inspections, and enforce compliance with SMCRA and state-specific mining laws
• The stringency and effectiveness of state oversight vary, with some states accused of lax enforcement and industry capture
• Advocates have called for stronger state regulations to address the specific impacts of MTR, such as more rigorous permitting criteria and increased bonding requirements

Reclamation and post-mining land use

• Reclamation refers to the process of restoring land and water resources affected by MTR to a stable and productive condition
• The success and adequacy of reclamation efforts have been subject to debate, with critics pointing to the challenges of restoring complex ecosystems and the limited post-mining land use options

Reclamation requirements and practices

• SMCRA requires mining companies to develop and implement reclamation plans as part of the permitting process
• Reclamation typically involves backfilling and regrading mined areas, stabilizing slopes, and revegetating the land with grass, shrubs, and trees
• Mining companies must post performance bonds to ensure that reclamation is completed according to approved plans
• Reclamation practices have evolved over time, with increased emphasis on reforestation, stream restoration, and wildlife habitat creation

Challenges of restoring MTR sites

• The scale and severity of land disturbance associated with MTR pose significant challenges for successful reclamation
• Soil compaction, loss of topsoil, and changes in hydrology can hinder the establishment of native vegetation and the recovery of ecosystem functions
• The creation of artificial landscapes, such as highly compacted and geometrically shaped landforms, can limit the potential for diverse and resilient ecosystems
• Acid mine drainage and the leaching of toxic substances from mine spoils can impair water quality and aquatic habitats long after reclamation is complete

Potential post-mining land uses

• Reclaimed MTR sites have been used for a variety of purposes, including wildlife habitat, pastureland, commercial forestry, and industrial development
• Some sites have been converted into golf courses, off-road vehicle parks, and other recreational facilities
• There is growing interest in using reclaimed sites for renewable energy projects, such as wind and solar farms
• However, the suitability of reclaimed land for certain uses may be limited by factors such as soil quality, topography, and access to infrastructure

Criticisms of reclamation efforts

• Critics argue that reclamation often fails to restore the ecological integrity and biodiversity of pre-mining landscapes
• Reclaimed sites may lack the structural complexity, species diversity, and ecosystem services provided by natural forests and streams
• The use of non-native, invasive species in revegetation can hinder the recovery of native plant communities and wildlife populations
• Inadequate monitoring and maintenance of reclaimed sites can lead to long-term environmental problems, such as erosion, sedimentation, and water pollution

Alternatives to mountaintop removal

• Given the significant environmental, health, and social impacts of MTR, there is growing interest in exploring more sustainable alternatives for energy production and economic development in Appalachia
• These alternatives seek to balance the region's need for jobs and revenue with the protection of its natural and cultural heritage

Traditional underground mining

• Underground mining methods, such as room-and-pillar and longwall mining, can extract coal with less surface disturbance than MTR
• These methods require more labor and have higher production costs, but they can be more selective in targeting high-quality coal seams
• Underground mining still poses environmental and health risks, such as subsidence, water pollution, and mine safety hazards
• Technological advances, such as directional drilling and automated mining equipment, can improve the efficiency and safety of underground operations

Renewable energy sources

• Appalachia has significant potential for renewable energy development, particularly in the areas of wind, solar, and hydropower
• Transitioning to clean energy sources can create jobs, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and mitigate the environmental impacts of coal mining
• Wind farms on reclaimed MTR sites and other ridgetops can take advantage of the region's high-elevation wind resources
• Solar installations on former mining lands and abandoned industrial sites can provide a sustainable use for degraded landscapes
• Small-scale hydropower projects can generate electricity while improving water quality and aquatic habitat

Economic diversification in Appalachia

• Reducing the region's dependence on coal mining requires investing in a more diverse and resilient economy
• Strategies for economic diversification include supporting small businesses, attracting new industries, and promoting entrepreneurship
• Sectors with growth potential in Appalachia include tourism, agriculture, advanced manufacturing, and creative industries
• Investing in education, workforce development, and infrastructure can help build the human and physical capital needed for a post-coal economy

Sustainable forestry and agriculture

• Sustainable management of Appalachia's forests can provide economic opportunities while preserving biodiversity and ecosystem services
• Practices such as selective harvesting, agroforestry, and non-timber forest product cultivation can generate income while maintaining forest health
• Organic and regenerative agriculture can help revitalize rural communities, improve food security, and protect soil and water resources
• Agritourism, farm-to-table initiatives, and value-added processing can enhance the profitability and sustainability of small-scale farming