You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides
You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides

9.2 Negotiating Mergers and Acquisitions

3 min readaugust 9, 2024

Mergers and acquisitions are complex deals that require careful negotiation. From deal terms to risk allocation, there's a lot to consider. Buyers and sellers must navigate purchase prices, earn-outs, and stock vs. asset purchases while protecting their interests.

Regulatory hurdles and executive issues add another layer of complexity. Parties must obtain necessary approvals, address antitrust concerns, and manage executive compensation. Successful M&A negotiations balance these factors to create mutually beneficial outcomes.

Deal Terms

Key Components of M&A Transactions

Top images from around the web for Key Components of M&A Transactions
Top images from around the web for Key Components of M&A Transactions
  • Deal structure defines the framework of the merger or acquisition, outlining how assets, liabilities, and ownership will be transferred
  • Purchase price represents the total amount the acquiring company pays for the target company, often determined through methods (discounted cash flow, comparable company analysis)
  • Earn-outs allow for additional payments to the seller based on future performance metrics, bridging valuation gaps between buyer and seller expectations
  • Stock vs. asset purchase determines whether the buyer acquires the target company's stock or specific assets
    • Stock purchase involves buying the entire company, including all assets and liabilities
    • Asset purchase allows the buyer to select specific assets and liabilities to acquire

Negotiation Strategies for Deal Terms

  • Buyers often prefer asset purchases to avoid inheriting unknown liabilities
  • Sellers typically favor stock purchases for tax advantages and simplicity
  • Earn-outs can be structured with various performance metrics (revenue, EBITDA, market share)
  • Negotiating parties must consider tax implications of different deal structures
  • plays a crucial role in determining appropriate purchase price and deal structure

Risk Allocation

Contractual Protections in M&A Agreements

  • Representations and warranties serve as legally binding statements about the target company's condition, protecting the buyer from undisclosed issues
  • Indemnification clauses outline how parties will compensate each other for losses resulting from breaches of representations and warranties
  • Non-compete clauses restrict the seller from engaging in similar business activities for a specified period, protecting the buyer's investment
  • Break-up fees compensate the potential buyer if the deal falls through due to specific reasons, discouraging the seller from pursuing other offers

Negotiating Risk Allocation Mechanisms

  • Buyers typically seek comprehensive representations and warranties to uncover potential issues
  • Sellers aim to limit the scope and duration of representations and warranties to reduce potential liability
  • Indemnification caps and baskets help balance risk between parties
    • Caps limit the total amount of indemnification
    • Baskets set a minimum threshold for indemnification claims
  • Non-compete clauses require careful negotiation of geographic scope, duration, and covered activities
  • Break-up fees are often set as a percentage of the deal value (typically 1-5%)

Regulatory & Executive Issues

  • Regulatory approvals from government agencies ensure compliance with and industry-specific regulations
  • Hart-Scott-Rodino Act requires pre-merger notification for transactions meeting certain thresholds
  • Foreign investment reviews (CFIUS in the United States) assess national security implications of cross-border deals
  • Industry-specific regulators may need to approve transactions in sectors like banking, healthcare, and telecommunications
  • Parties must consider potential remedies to address regulatory concerns (divestiture of certain assets)

Managing Executive Compensation and Retention

  • Golden parachutes provide executives with significant benefits if they are terminated due to a change in company control
  • Negotiating parties must consider the impact of golden parachutes on deal economics and shareholder perceptions
  • Retention agreements aim to keep key executives during and after the transaction
  • Change-in-control provisions in executive contracts may trigger accelerated vesting of equity awards
  • Buyers often seek to renegotiate or limit golden parachutes to align with their post-merger plans
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Glossary