9.4 Relief from Judgment

Relief from judgment is a crucial aspect of civil procedure, allowing courts to rectify errors or address unfair outcomes. This topic explores Rule 60, which outlines grounds for relief like mistake, newly discovered evidence, and fraud. It's a safety valve in the legal system.

Understanding relief from judgment is essential for grasping how courts balance finality with fairness. We'll look at the specific requirements, time limitations, and factors courts consider when deciding whether to grant relief. It's all about ensuring justice while maintaining order.

Relief from Final Judgments under Rule 60

Grounds for Relief under Rule 60

Top images from around the web for Grounds for Relief under Rule 60

• 

  Register for the free Wise Decision Maker Course today View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Civil Procedure - 1L Survival Guide - Research Guides at Florida State University College of Law ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  U S Courts: Due Process and Equality Under the Law | United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Register for the free Wise Decision Maker Course today View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Civil Procedure - 1L Survival Guide - Research Guides at Florida State University College of Law ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Grounds for Relief under Rule 60

• 

  Register for the free Wise Decision Maker Course today View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Civil Procedure - 1L Survival Guide - Research Guides at Florida State University College of Law ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  U S Courts: Due Process and Equality Under the Law | United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Register for the free Wise Decision Maker Course today View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Civil Procedure - 1L Survival Guide - Research Guides at Florida State University College of Law ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure outlines methods for seeking relief from final judgments, orders, or proceedings
• Two primary avenues for relief include motion under Rule 60(b) or independent action in equity
• Six specific grounds for relief under Rule 60(b) encompass mistake, inadvertence, surprise, excusable neglect, newly discovered evidence, and fraud or misconduct by opposing party
• Rule 60(b)(6) functions as catch-all provision allowing relief for "any other reason that justifies relief" not covered by first five grounds
• Additional grounds for relief include void judgments (Rule 60(b)(4)) and satisfied, released, or discharged judgments (Rule 60(b)(5))
• Courts may correct clerical mistakes, oversights, or omissions in judgments on their own initiative or by party motion under Rule 60(a)
  • Examples of clerical errors include typographical mistakes, incorrect dates, or mathematical errors in damage calculations

Nature and Purpose of Relief from Judgment

• Relief from judgment serves as extraordinary remedy granted only in exceptional circumstances
• Primary purpose involves preventing manifest injustice in legal proceedings
• Courts balance interest in finality of judgments against interest in justice and fairness
• Relief aims to address situations where strict adherence to judgment would result in unfair outcomes
  • Example: Relief granted when newly discovered evidence proves defendant's innocence in criminal case
  • Example: Relief provided when fraud by opposing party significantly influenced original judgment

Rule 60 Subsections: Requirements and Limitations

Time Limitations for Rule 60 Motions

• Rule 60(a) allows correction of clerical mistakes or errors at any time
• Rule 60(b)(1)-(3) motions (mistake, newly discovered evidence, fraud) must be filed within one year of judgment entry
• Rule 60(b)(4)-(6) motions (void judgment, satisfaction of judgment, other reasons) require filing within "reasonable time"
  • Courts determine reasonable time on case-by-case basis considering factors like length of delay and reason for delay
• Independent actions for relief under Rule 60(d) not subject to one-year limit but must be brought within reasonable time

Specific Requirements for Rule 60 Subsections

• Rule 60(c) stipulates motion under Rule 60(b) does not affect judgment's finality or suspend operation unless court orders otherwise
• Rule 60(b)(3) necessitates clear and convincing evidence of fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct by opposing party
  • Example: Proving opposing party deliberately withheld crucial documents during discovery
• Rule 60(b)(2) requires newly discovered evidence could not have been discovered in time to move for new trial under Rule 59(b)
  • Example: Key witness coming forward after trial with previously unknown information
• Rule 60(b)(6) motions demand showing of "extraordinary circumstances" justifying relief
  • High standard rarely met in practice
  • Example: Subsequent change in law that fundamentally alters legal landscape of case

Factors for Granting Relief from Judgment

Court Considerations in Decision-Making

• Courts evaluate timeliness of motion with less likelihood of granting relief for unreasonable delays
• Movant's diligence in pursuing relief assessed along with adequacy of explanation for any delay
• Prejudice to non-moving party if relief granted factored into court's decision-making process
  • Example: Significant financial investments made by non-moving party based on original judgment
• Strength of movant's underlying claim or defense and likelihood of different outcome if relief granted considered
• In fraud or misconduct cases, courts weigh severity and impact of alleged wrongdoing on judgment
  • Example: Assessing whether fraudulent evidence was central to court's decision or merely peripheral

Equitable Considerations

• Courts may apply principles of equity such as unclean hands or laches when deciding on relief
• Unclean hands doctrine may bar relief if movant engaged in improper conduct related to matter in question
  • Example: Movant found to have withheld relevant information during original proceedings
• Laches principle may prevent relief if unreasonable delay in seeking it prejudiced opposing party
• Overall fairness and justice of situation taken into account
  • Courts aim to strike balance between finality of judgments and need to correct serious errors or injustices