9.2 Russell's Theory of Descriptions

Bertrand Russell's theory of descriptions revolutionized how we understand sentences with definite descriptions. It breaks down phrases like "the present King of France" into three logical claims, solving puzzles that arise when the described entity doesn't exist.

This theory shows how sentences can be more complex than they seem. By analyzing their logical structure, we can determine truth values and avoid paradoxes. It's a powerful tool for clear thinking in language and logic.

Russell's Theory of Descriptions

Russell's theory of descriptions

Top images from around the web for Russell's theory of descriptions

• 

  Russell View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Definite descriptions and negative existential quantifiers | Philosophical Studies View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Presupposition, assertion, and definite descriptions | Linguistics and Philosophy View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Russell View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Definite descriptions and negative existential quantifiers | Philosophical Studies View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Russell's theory of descriptions

• 

  Russell View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Definite descriptions and negative existential quantifiers | Philosophical Studies View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Presupposition, assertion, and definite descriptions | Linguistics and Philosophy View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Russell View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Definite descriptions and negative existential quantifiers | Philosophical Studies View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Philosophical analysis of the logical form of sentences containing definite descriptions (the present King of France)
• Resolves puzzles arising from definite descriptions in sentences
• Sentence "The present King of France is bald" is neither true nor false since there is no present King of France
• Proposes sentences with definite descriptions have a more complex logical structure than they appear on the surface
• Argues such sentences are a conjunction of three separate logical claims
• Allows for clear analysis of truth conditions of sentences containing definite descriptions
• Eliminates need for postulating non-existent entities or truth-value gaps
• Has significant implications for philosophy of language and logic
• Demonstrates importance of analyzing logical form of sentences to resolve apparent paradoxes and puzzles (the barber paradox)

Logical structure of definite descriptions

• Sentence "The F is G" (F is definite description, G is predicate) analyzed as conjunction of three logical claims:
  1. At least one F exists: $\exists x(Fx)$
  2. At most one F exists: $\forall x\forall y((Fx \land Fy) \rightarrow x = y)$
  3. Whatever is F is also G: $\forall x(Fx \rightarrow Gx)$
• First claim asserts existence of at least one individual satisfying description F
• Second claim states no more than one individual satisfies description F
  • If any two individuals satisfy F, they must be the same individual
• Third claim asserts any individual satisfying description F must also have property G
• Three claims together provide complete analysis of logical structure of sentences containing definite descriptions

Predicate logic for definite descriptions

• To convert sentence with definite description to logical form using predicate logic:
  1. Identify definite description (F) and predicate (G) in sentence
  2. Introduce variable (x) to represent individual satisfying description
  3. Express three logical claims using quantifiers, connectives, and predicates F and G
• Example: "The present King of France is bald" converted to logical form:
  • $\exists x(Kx \land \forall y(Ky \rightarrow x = y) \land Bx)$
  • $Kx$ means "x is the present King of France", $Bx$ means "x is bald"
• Logical form makes explicit the three claims:
  1. An individual x exists who is the present King of France
  2. For any individual y, if y is present King of France, then y is the same as x
  3. Individual x is bald
• Converting sentences to logical form allows easier evaluation of truth values and analysis of logical structure

Truth values in definite descriptions

• To evaluate truth value of statement with definite description, consider truth values of three logical claims constituting its logical form
• Statement "The F is G" is true if and only if all three constituent logical claims are true
  • If any of three claims is false, entire statement is false
• Example: "The present King of France is bald"
  • First claim, $\exists x(Kx)$, is false because there is no present King of France
  • Since one of three claims is false, entire statement is false, regardless of truth values of other two claims
• When definite description refers to existing unique individual, truth value depends on whether individual satisfies predicate G
  • "The author of 'Principia Mathematica' was British" is true because Bertrand Russell, the unique individual satisfying the description, was British
• Evaluating truth values of constituent logical claims determines truth value of entire statement containing definite description