You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides
You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides

9.2 Spacecraft Power Generation and Storage

3 min readjuly 19, 2024

Spacecraft power systems are crucial for mission success. From to radioisotope generators, each method has unique advantages and limitations. Choosing the right power source depends on mission duration, distance from the sun, and spacecraft constraints.

Energy storage is equally important for spacecraft operations. and offer different benefits, while emerging technologies like and advanced battery chemistries promise improved performance. These innovations could revolutionize future space missions.

Power Generation Methods

Power generation methods for spacecraft

Top images from around the web for Power generation methods for spacecraft
Top images from around the web for Power generation methods for spacecraft
  • Solar panels convert sunlight into electricity using photovoltaic cells
    • Most common power source for Earth-orbiting satellites (International Space Station) and deep space probes (Juno spacecraft)
    • Advantages include being renewable, lightweight, and reliable
    • Limitations include ineffectiveness in shadow or far from the sun and susceptibility to radiation damage
  • (RTGs) convert heat from radioactive decay into electricity using the Seebeck effect
    • Used in missions where solar power is insufficient such as outer planet exploration (Voyager 1 and 2, Cassini-Huygens)
    • Advantages include being long-lasting, reliable, and independent of sunlight
    • Limitations include being expensive, heavy, and potential safety concerns due to radioactive materials (plutonium-238)
  • generate electricity through an electrochemical reaction between hydrogen and oxygen
    • Used in manned spacecraft such as the Space Shuttle and Apollo missions
    • Advantages include high energy density, clean byproduct (water), and ability to provide drinking water for crew
    • Limitations include requiring storage of reactants (liquid hydrogen and oxygen), limited lifetime, and complex management systems

Energy Storage Systems

Energy storage in spacecraft systems

  • Batteries store electrical energy through reversible chemical reactions
    • Commonly used types include lithium-ion (Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter), nickel-cadmium (Hubble Space Telescope), and nickel-metal hydride
    • Advantages include high energy density, reliability, and being space-proven technology
    • Limitations include limited charge/discharge cycles, temperature sensitivity, and potential for overheating
  • Supercapacitors store energy in an electric field between two electrodes
    • Used for applications requiring high power density and rapid charge/discharge cycles
    • Advantages include long cycle life, wide temperature range (-40℃ to 65℃), and high power density
    • Limitations include lower energy density compared to batteries, self-discharge, and high cost

Power system selection for missions

  • Mission duration and power requirements influence power system selection
    • Longer missions and higher power demands necessitate larger and more robust power systems
  • Distance from the sun affects power generation method choice
    • Solar panel effectiveness decreases with increasing distance from the sun
    • RTGs become more suitable for outer planet missions (Galileo spacecraft) or deep space exploration (New Horizons)
  • Spacecraft size and mass constraints impact power system design
    • Power system components must fit within the spacecraft's mass and volume budgets
    • Trade-offs between power generation capacity and other subsystems are necessary
  • Redundancy and reliability requirements drive power system complexity
    • Critical missions may require multiple power sources and redundant components
    • Increased reliability comes at the cost of added complexity and mass

Emerging technologies in spacecraft power

  • Flexible solar cells offer new possibilities for power generation
    • Lightweight and can conform to spacecraft surfaces, increasing available power generation area
    • Potential for reduced stowage volume and deployment mechanisms
    • Challenges include durability, (currently around 10-15%), and integration with spacecraft structures
  • Advanced battery chemistries promise improved performance
    • Lithium-sulfur and offer higher energy densities (500-1000 Wh/kg) compared to traditional lithium-ion (150-250 Wh/kg)
    • promise improved safety, longer cycle life (1000+ cycles), and wider temperature range (-20℃ to 100℃)
    • Challenges include manufacturing scalability, cost, and space qualification testing
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Glossary