9.7 School discipline and the school-to-prison pipeline

School discipline practices disproportionately impact students of color, contributing to the school-to-prison pipeline. Zero-tolerance policies, overuse of suspensions, and increased police presence in schools funnel marginalized students into the justice system.

Racial bias, lack of cultural competency, and punitive approaches exacerbate these issues. Alternatives like restorative justice and positive behavioral interventions offer more equitable solutions. Reforms are needed to address systemic inequalities in school discipline.

Racial disparities in school discipline

• Racial disparities in school discipline refer to the disproportionate rates at which students of color, particularly Black and Latino students, face disciplinary actions compared to their White peers
• These disparities persist even when controlling for factors such as socioeconomic status and behavior, suggesting that race plays a significant role in how discipline is administered
• Contributes to the perpetuation of systemic racism and inequality in the education system, hindering the academic and social progress of students of color

Zero-tolerance policies and consequences

• Zero-tolerance policies mandate predetermined consequences, usually severe, for specific offenses, regardless of the circumstances or context
• Often result in harsh punishments, such as suspensions or expulsions, for relatively minor infractions (tardiness, dress code violations)
• Disproportionately affect students of color, as they are more likely to be targeted and punished under these policies

Disproportionate impact on students of color

Top images from around the web for Disproportionate impact on students of color

• 

  Taking the school-to-prison pipeline fight to state legislatures View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Students push to limit school police after Newtown - Waging Nonviolence View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  School-to-Prison Pipeline: Inequality in Education – Youth Voices View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Taking the school-to-prison pipeline fight to state legislatures View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Students push to limit school police after Newtown - Waging Nonviolence View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Disproportionate impact on students of color

• 

  Taking the school-to-prison pipeline fight to state legislatures View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Students push to limit school police after Newtown - Waging Nonviolence View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  School-to-Prison Pipeline: Inequality in Education – Youth Voices View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Taking the school-to-prison pipeline fight to state legislatures View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Students push to limit school police after Newtown - Waging Nonviolence View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Students of color, especially Black students, are more likely to be suspended or expelled under zero-tolerance policies compared to their White peers
• These policies fail to consider the unique challenges and circumstances faced by students of color, such as poverty, trauma, and discrimination
• The rigid nature of zero-tolerance policies leaves little room for discretion or consideration of mitigating factors, leading to the overrepresentation of students of color in disciplinary actions

Criminalization of student misbehavior

• The criminalization of student misbehavior refers to the trend of treating minor infractions as criminal offenses, rather than addressing them through school-based interventions
• This shift in approach has led to increased police presence in schools and the use of harsh, punitive measures for student misconduct
• Disproportionately impacts students of color, who are more likely to be perceived as threatening or disruptive, even for minor misbehavior

Minor infractions vs serious offenses

• Minor infractions, such as talking back to a teacher or disrupting class, are often met with the same severe consequences as more serious offenses (fighting, drug possession)
• This lack of distinction between minor and serious offenses contributes to the overuse of suspensions and expulsions, particularly for students of color
• Addressing minor infractions with harsh punishments fails to provide students with the support and guidance needed to improve their behavior and succeed academically

School resource officers and policing

• School resource officers (SROs) are law enforcement officers assigned to work in schools, ostensibly to maintain safety and security
• However, the presence of SROs has led to the increased criminalization of student behavior, as minor infractions are more likely to be handled by police rather than school staff
• SROs often lack proper training in child development, de-escalation techniques, and cultural competency, which can exacerbate conflicts and lead to unnecessary arrests or use of force

Role in escalating disciplinary issues

• SROs may escalate disciplinary issues by intervening in situations that could be handled by school staff, leading to more severe consequences for students
• The mere presence of SROs can create a hostile and intimidating environment, particularly for students of color who may have negative experiences with law enforcement outside of school
• The involvement of SROs in school discipline can contribute to the school-to-prison pipeline by increasing the likelihood of student arrests and referrals to the juvenile justice system

Suspensions and expulsions

• Suspensions and expulsions are disciplinary actions that remove students from the classroom or school environment for a specified period or permanently
• These punishments are often used excessively, particularly for students of color, and can have severe consequences for their academic and social development
• Alternatives to suspensions and expulsions, such as restorative justice practices and positive behavioral interventions, have been shown to be more effective in addressing student misbehavior and promoting a positive school climate

Overuse for students of color

• Black students are suspended and expelled at rates three times higher than their White peers, even when controlling for factors such as socioeconomic status and behavior
• This overuse of suspensions and expulsions for students of color is often driven by implicit bias, stereotyping, and a lack of cultural understanding among educators and administrators
• The disproportionate use of these punishments contributes to the widening achievement gap and perpetuates systemic inequalities in education

Academic and social consequences

• Suspensions and expulsions can have severe academic consequences, as students miss valuable instructional time and fall behind in their coursework
• Students who are suspended or expelled are more likely to experience grade retention, drop out of school, and have lower academic achievement overall
• These punishments also have social consequences, as students may feel alienated from their peers and school community, leading to increased risk of behavioral problems and delinquency

School-to-prison pipeline definition

• The school-to-prison pipeline refers to the policies and practices that push students, particularly students of color and those with disabilities, out of schools and into the juvenile and criminal justice systems
• It is a metaphor for the way in which harsh disciplinary policies, zero-tolerance approaches, and the criminalization of student behavior contribute to the funneling of students into the justice system
• The school-to-prison pipeline perpetuates systemic racism and inequality, as it disproportionately affects students of color and those from disadvantaged backgrounds

Funneling students into justice system

• The school-to-prison pipeline funnels students into the justice system through a combination of factors, including excessive suspensions and expulsions, school-based arrests, and referrals to law enforcement
• Once students become involved with the juvenile or criminal justice system, they face significant barriers to educational and social progress, such as difficulty re-enrolling in school, stigma, and increased likelihood of future incarceration
• The funneling of students into the justice system contributes to the ongoing cycle of poverty, inequality, and mass incarceration that disproportionately affects communities of color

Factors contributing to pipeline

• Several factors contribute to the school-to-prison pipeline, including zero-tolerance policies, the criminalization of student behavior, and the presence of school resource officers
• These factors are often rooted in systemic racism, implicit bias, and a lack of cultural competency among educators and administrators
• Addressing these underlying issues is crucial to dismantling the school-to-prison pipeline and promoting a more equitable and supportive educational environment for all students

Implicit bias and stereotyping

• Implicit bias refers to the unconscious attitudes and stereotypes that affect our understanding, actions, and decisions
• In the context of school discipline, implicit bias can lead educators and administrators to perceive students of color as more threatening, disruptive, or disrespectful, even when their behavior is similar to that of their White peers
• This bias can result in harsher disciplinary actions for students of color, contributing to the disproportionate rates of suspensions, expulsions, and school-based arrests

Lack of cultural competency in schools

• Cultural competency refers to the ability to understand, communicate with, and effectively interact with people across cultures
• Many schools lack culturally responsive practices and fail to consider the diverse backgrounds and experiences of their students, particularly those from marginalized communities
• This lack of cultural competency can lead to misunderstandings, miscommunication, and the misinterpretation of student behavior, resulting in disproportionate disciplinary actions for students of color

Consequences of school-to-prison pipeline

• The school-to-prison pipeline has far-reaching consequences for students, families, and communities, perpetuating cycles of poverty, inequality, and incarceration
• Students who are pushed out of schools and into the justice system face significant barriers to educational attainment, employment, and social mobility
• The consequences of the school-to-prison pipeline disproportionately affect communities of color, exacerbating existing disparities and hindering progress towards racial and social justice

Increased dropout rates

• Students who experience excessive suspensions, expulsions, and school-based arrests are more likely to disengage from school and eventually drop out
• Dropout rates are significantly higher for students of color, particularly those who have been involved in the juvenile or criminal justice system
• Dropping out of school can have lifelong consequences, including limited employment opportunities, lower earning potential, and increased risk of poverty and incarceration

Higher risk of incarceration

• Students who are pushed out of schools and into the justice system are at a higher risk of future incarceration
• The experience of being arrested, detained, or incarcerated as a juvenile can lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy, as students internalize the label of "criminal" and engage in further delinquent behavior
• The school-to-prison pipeline contributes to the overrepresentation of people of color in the criminal justice system, perpetuating the cycle of mass incarceration and its devastating impact on communities of color

Alternatives to punitive discipline

• To address the school-to-prison pipeline, schools must adopt alternatives to punitive discipline that prioritize student well-being, growth, and development
• These alternatives focus on building positive relationships, addressing the root causes of misbehavior, and providing students with the support and resources they need to succeed
• Implementing these alternative approaches requires a shift in mindset, policies, and practices, as well as ongoing training and support for educators and administrators

Restorative justice practices

• Restorative justice is an approach to discipline that focuses on repairing harm, building relationships, and promoting accountability and empathy
• It involves bringing together the person who caused harm, those who were harmed, and the broader community to discuss the impact of the behavior and develop a plan to make things right
• Restorative practices, such as circles and conferences, provide students with the opportunity to take responsibility for their actions, understand the consequences of their behavior, and work towards positive change

Positive behavioral interventions and supports

• Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) is a framework for promoting positive school culture and supporting student behavior
• It involves setting clear expectations for behavior, teaching and reinforcing positive behaviors, and providing targeted interventions for students who need additional support
• PBIS emphasizes prevention, early intervention, and data-driven decision-making to create a positive and supportive learning environment for all students

Reforms to address school-to-prison pipeline

• Addressing the school-to-prison pipeline requires a comprehensive approach that involves policy changes, increased funding for support services, and improved training for educators and administrators
• These reforms must be grounded in a commitment to racial and social justice, recognizing the disproportionate impact of punitive discipline on students of color and those from disadvantaged backgrounds
• Implementing these reforms will require collaboration among schools, communities, policymakers, and advocates to create lasting, systemic change

Policy changes at local and state levels

• Local and state policymakers can play a crucial role in addressing the school-to-prison pipeline by enacting policies that prioritize student well-being and equity
• This may include eliminating zero-tolerance policies, limiting the use of suspensions and expulsions, and restricting the role of school resource officers
• Policymakers can also incentivize the adoption of alternative disciplinary practices, such as restorative justice and PBIS, through funding and technical assistance

Increased funding for support services

• Addressing the school-to-prison pipeline requires investing in support services that meet the diverse needs of students, particularly those from marginalized communities
• This may include increasing funding for school counselors, social workers, and mental health professionals who can provide targeted interventions and support for students facing behavioral or emotional challenges
• Increased funding for community-based organizations and afterschool programs can also provide students with additional support and opportunities for positive engagement

Improved training for educators and administrators

• Providing ongoing, high-quality training for educators and administrators is essential to addressing the school-to-prison pipeline
• This training should focus on cultural competency, implicit bias, trauma-informed practices, and alternative disciplinary approaches, such as restorative justice and PBIS
• Improved training can help educators and administrators better understand and respond to the diverse needs of their students, creating a more inclusive and supportive school environment