10.2 Political Action Committees (PACs) and Super PACs

Political Action Committees (PACs) and Super PACs play a crucial role in U.S. elections. These organizations pool campaign contributions and donate funds to candidates, ballot initiatives, or political parties, significantly impacting fundraising and electoral outcomes.

The rise of Super PACs, following the Citizens United decision, has transformed campaign finance. With unlimited fundraising and spending capabilities, these groups wield enormous influence, shaping public opinion and potentially swaying close races through massive ad campaigns and targeted messaging.

Understanding PACs and Super PACs

Definition of PACs

Top images from around the web for Definition of PACs

• 

  The Shape of Modern Political Parties | American Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Pathways of Interest Group Influence | American Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Interest Groups as Political Participation – American Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Shape of Modern Political Parties | American Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Pathways of Interest Group Influence | American Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Definition of PACs

• 

  The Shape of Modern Political Parties | American Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Pathways of Interest Group Influence | American Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Interest Groups as Political Participation – American Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Shape of Modern Political Parties | American Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Pathways of Interest Group Influence | American Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Political Action Committees pool campaign contributions from members donate funds to candidates, ballot initiatives, or political parties
• Types of PACs:
  • Connected PACs affiliated with corporations, labor unions, or trade associations (Boeing PAC, AFL-CIO PAC)
  • Non-connected PACs independent organizations focused on ideological or single-issue causes (EMILY's List, National Rifle Association PAC)
• Role in campaign fundraising:
  • Collect donations from individuals bundle contributions to maximize impact
  • Provide financial support to aligned candidates or causes amplify collective voice of members

Traditional PACs vs Super PACs

• Traditional PACs:
  • Contribution limits: $5,000 per candidate per election$15,000 to national party committees annually
  • Disclosure requirements: report all contributions and expenditures to FEC ensure transparency
• Super PACs:
  • Independent expenditure-only committees created after Citizens United v. FEC decision
  • Fundraising capabilities: no limits on contributions from individuals, corporations, or unions
  • Spending capabilities: unlimited amounts on independent expenditures like TV ads, mailings
  • Restrictions: prohibited from directly coordinating with candidates or campaigns maintain independence
  • Disclosure requirements: report donors to FEC less frequently than traditional PACs

Influence of PACs on elections

• Electoral outcomes:
  • Increased campaign spending flood airwaves with political ads
  • Fund extensive advertising campaigns shape public perception of candidates
  • Sway close races through last-minute spending blitzes (2016 Pennsylvania Senate race)
• Policy decisions:
  • Lobbying efforts push for specific legislation or regulations
  • Influence legislative priorities through targeted donations
  • Potential for quid pro quo arrangements raise ethical concerns
• Impact on political discourse:
  • Shape public opinion through targeted messaging on key issues
  • Amplify specific issues or candidates dominate media coverage

Debate over PACs in politics

• Arguments in favor:
  • Freedom of speech and association protected by First Amendment
  • Increased political participation engage more citizens in process
  • Counterbalance incumbent advantages level playing field for challengers
  • Provide resources for lesser-known candidates increase diversity of candidates
• Arguments against:
  • Disproportionate influence of wealthy donors skew political agenda
  • Potential for corruption or appearance of corruption undermine public trust
  • Distortion of democratic processes drown out voices of average citizens
  • Lack of transparency in Super PAC operations obscure true sources of funding
• Reform proposals:
  • Enhanced disclosure requirements increase transparency of political spending
  • Public financing of campaigns reduce reliance on private money
  • Constitutional amendments to overturn Citizens United decision limit corporate political spending