Calderas come in three main flavors: collapse, explosion, and erosion. Each type forms differently and has unique features. Understanding these differences is key to grasping how supervolcanoes shape our planet's surface.
Calderas evolve through stages, from pre-caldera buildup to post-caldera quiet periods and potential reawakening. This lifecycle helps us predict future volcanic activity and assess risks to nearby communities. It's a crucial part of studying supervolcanoes.
Caldera Types and Formation
Collapse Calderas
Top images from around the web for Collapse Calderas
Frontiers | Editorial: Magma-Rock and Magma-Mush Interactions as Fundamental Processes of ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Volcanic Lateral Collapse Processes in Mafic Arc Edifices: A Review of Their Driving ... View original
Frontiers | Editorial: Magma-Rock and Magma-Mush Interactions as Fundamental Processes of ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Volcanic Lateral Collapse Processes in Mafic Arc Edifices: A Review of Their Driving ... View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Form when a magma chamber is partially emptied, leading to the unsupported roof collapsing into the void
Examples include (USA) and (Japan)
Typically larger than explosion calderas, as they are related to the size of the underlying magma chamber
Often associated with silicic magmas (rhyolitic to dacitic)
Explosion Calderas (Krakatoa-type)
Form during explosive volcanic eruptions when the magma chamber is completely emptied, and the overlying rock is blasted away
Examples include (Indonesia) and (Greece)
Usually smaller than collapse calderas and may have a more irregular shape due to the explosive nature of their formation
Can be associated with a wider range of magma compositions (basaltic to rhyolitic)
Erosion Calderas (Glencoe-type)
Form when a volcanic edifice is heavily eroded, exposing the underlying magma chamber
An example is (Scotland)
Have a more irregular or dissected morphology compared to the more circular or elliptical shape of collapse and explosion calderas
Formation process differs from collapse and explosion calderas, as they form through erosion rather than a singular eruptive event
Caldera Morphology
Varies depending on the formation process and can be characterized by size, shape, and the presence of resurgent domes or
Collapse calderas are typically larger and more circular or elliptical in shape
Explosion calderas are usually smaller and may have a more irregular shape
Erosion calderas have a more irregular or dissected morphology due to the erosional processes involved in their formation
Caldera Development Stages
Pre-caldera Volcanism
Involves the buildup of a volcanic edifice through repeated eruptions from a central vent or multiple vents
Characterized by the accumulation of lava flows, pyroclastic deposits, and the growth of a magma chamber
Sets the stage for the caldera-forming eruption by creating an unstable magmatic system
Caldera-forming Eruptions
Occur when the magma chamber becomes unstable, leading to large-scale evacuation of magma and the collapse of the overlying rock
Can be highly explosive and produce extensive pyroclastic deposits
Result in the formation of the caldera structure, which may be a , , or
Post-caldera Quiescence
Immediately following the caldera-forming eruption, the caldera may experience a period of reduced activity
The caldera floor may be filled with volcanic deposits, water (forming a ), or sediments
This stage represents a period of relative stability in the caldera system
Post-caldera Volcanism
Can occur within the caldera or along its margins
May include the formation of resurgent domes, lava domes, or cinder cones, as well as the eruption of lava flows and pyroclastic materials
Indicates that the magmatic system is still active and evolving
The presence and nature of post-caldera volcanism can vary between caldera types
Long-term Evolution
The caldera may undergo further collapse or erosion over time, modifying its original morphology
Hydrothermal activity and mineralization may also occur during the post-caldera stage
The caldera system continues to evolve over time, influenced by factors such as magma recharge, regional stress fields, and erosional processes
Caldera Types: Comparison and Contrast
Formation Mechanisms
Collapse calderas form due to the emptying and collapse of a magma chamber
Explosion calderas form during explosive eruptions that completely evacuate the magma chamber
Erosion calderas form through the erosion of a volcanic edifice rather than a singular eruptive event
Size and Shape
Collapse calderas are typically larger than explosion calderas, related to the size of the underlying magma chamber
Explosion calderas are usually smaller and may have a more irregular shape due to the explosive nature of their formation
Erosion calderas have a more irregular or dissected morphology compared to the more circular or elliptical shape of collapse and explosion calderas
Post-caldera Volcanism
Collapse calderas often experience resurgent doming and the formation of lava domes
Explosion calderas may have more dispersed post-caldera volcanism along the caldera margins
The presence and nature of post-caldera volcanism can vary between caldera types
Magma Composition
Collapse calderas are often related to silicic magmas (rhyolitic to dacitic)
Explosion calderas can be associated with a wider range of magma compositions (basaltic to rhyolitic)
The composition of the magma can influence the style and intensity of eruptions, as well as the morphology of the resulting caldera
Caldera Activity: Future Potential
Factors Influencing Future Activity
The presence of an active magma chamber, the rate of magma recharge, and the state of stress in the overlying rock
Increased seismicity, ground deformation, and changes in gas emissions may indicate magma movement or pressurization of the system
The recurrence interval of and the time elapsed since the last major eruption can provide a general guide to the potential for future activity
Monitoring Techniques
Seismicity monitoring, particularly earthquake swarms or tremor, may indicate magma movement or pressurization
Ground deformation, detected through GPS, InSAR, or tiltmeters, can reveal inflation or deflation of the caldera floor related to magma intrusion or withdrawal
Gas emission monitoring, such as SO2 or CO2 flux, can suggest magma degassing and potential unrest
These techniques provide insights into the current state of a caldera system and help assess the likelihood of future eruptions
Indicators of Potential Future Activity
The presence of active hydrothermal systems, resurgent doming, or recent post-caldera volcanism may indicate a higher likelihood of future activity
Calderas that have been dormant for long periods may have a lower potential for future activity compared to those with recent unrest
However, each caldera system is unique, and the timing of eruptions can be highly variable
Multidisciplinary Approach
Evaluating the potential for future activity in caldera systems requires integrating geological, geophysical, and geochemical data
Developing a comprehensive understanding of the system's behavior and evolution over time is crucial for assessing future eruption potential
Collaborations between volcanologists, geophysicists, geochemists, and other experts are essential for effective caldera monitoring and hazard assessment