You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides
You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides

Calderas come in three main flavors: collapse, explosion, and erosion. Each type forms differently and has unique features. Understanding these differences is key to grasping how supervolcanoes shape our planet's surface.

Calderas evolve through stages, from pre-caldera buildup to post-caldera quiet periods and potential reawakening. This lifecycle helps us predict future volcanic activity and assess risks to nearby communities. It's a crucial part of studying supervolcanoes.

Caldera Types and Formation

Collapse Calderas

Top images from around the web for Collapse Calderas
Top images from around the web for Collapse Calderas
  • Form when a magma chamber is partially emptied, leading to the unsupported roof collapsing into the void
  • Examples include (USA) and (Japan)
  • Typically larger than explosion calderas, as they are related to the size of the underlying magma chamber
  • Often associated with silicic magmas (rhyolitic to dacitic)

Explosion Calderas (Krakatoa-type)

  • Form during explosive volcanic eruptions when the magma chamber is completely emptied, and the overlying rock is blasted away
  • Examples include (Indonesia) and (Greece)
  • Usually smaller than collapse calderas and may have a more irregular shape due to the explosive nature of their formation
  • Can be associated with a wider range of magma compositions (basaltic to rhyolitic)

Erosion Calderas (Glencoe-type)

  • Form when a volcanic edifice is heavily eroded, exposing the underlying magma chamber
  • An example is (Scotland)
  • Have a more irregular or dissected morphology compared to the more circular or elliptical shape of collapse and explosion calderas
  • Formation process differs from collapse and explosion calderas, as they form through erosion rather than a singular eruptive event

Caldera Morphology

  • Varies depending on the formation process and can be characterized by size, shape, and the presence of resurgent domes or
  • Collapse calderas are typically larger and more circular or elliptical in shape
  • Explosion calderas are usually smaller and may have a more irregular shape
  • Erosion calderas have a more irregular or dissected morphology due to the erosional processes involved in their formation

Caldera Development Stages

Pre-caldera Volcanism

  • Involves the buildup of a volcanic edifice through repeated eruptions from a central vent or multiple vents
  • Characterized by the accumulation of lava flows, pyroclastic deposits, and the growth of a magma chamber
  • Sets the stage for the caldera-forming eruption by creating an unstable magmatic system

Caldera-forming Eruptions

  • Occur when the magma chamber becomes unstable, leading to large-scale evacuation of magma and the collapse of the overlying rock
  • Can be highly explosive and produce extensive pyroclastic deposits
  • Result in the formation of the caldera structure, which may be a , , or

Post-caldera Quiescence

  • Immediately following the caldera-forming eruption, the caldera may experience a period of reduced activity
  • The caldera floor may be filled with volcanic deposits, water (forming a ), or sediments
  • This stage represents a period of relative stability in the caldera system

Post-caldera Volcanism

  • Can occur within the caldera or along its margins
  • May include the formation of resurgent domes, lava domes, or cinder cones, as well as the eruption of lava flows and pyroclastic materials
  • Indicates that the magmatic system is still active and evolving
  • The presence and nature of post-caldera volcanism can vary between caldera types

Long-term Evolution

  • The caldera may undergo further collapse or erosion over time, modifying its original morphology
  • Hydrothermal activity and mineralization may also occur during the post-caldera stage
  • The caldera system continues to evolve over time, influenced by factors such as magma recharge, regional stress fields, and erosional processes

Caldera Types: Comparison and Contrast

Formation Mechanisms

  • Collapse calderas form due to the emptying and collapse of a magma chamber
  • Explosion calderas form during explosive eruptions that completely evacuate the magma chamber
  • Erosion calderas form through the erosion of a volcanic edifice rather than a singular eruptive event

Size and Shape

  • Collapse calderas are typically larger than explosion calderas, related to the size of the underlying magma chamber
  • Explosion calderas are usually smaller and may have a more irregular shape due to the explosive nature of their formation
  • Erosion calderas have a more irregular or dissected morphology compared to the more circular or elliptical shape of collapse and explosion calderas

Post-caldera Volcanism

  • Collapse calderas often experience resurgent doming and the formation of lava domes
  • Explosion calderas may have more dispersed post-caldera volcanism along the caldera margins
  • The presence and nature of post-caldera volcanism can vary between caldera types

Magma Composition

  • Collapse calderas are often related to silicic magmas (rhyolitic to dacitic)
  • Explosion calderas can be associated with a wider range of magma compositions (basaltic to rhyolitic)
  • The composition of the magma can influence the style and intensity of eruptions, as well as the morphology of the resulting caldera

Caldera Activity: Future Potential

Factors Influencing Future Activity

  • The presence of an active magma chamber, the rate of magma recharge, and the state of stress in the overlying rock
  • Increased seismicity, ground deformation, and changes in gas emissions may indicate magma movement or pressurization of the system
  • The recurrence interval of and the time elapsed since the last major eruption can provide a general guide to the potential for future activity

Monitoring Techniques

  • Seismicity monitoring, particularly earthquake swarms or tremor, may indicate magma movement or pressurization
  • Ground deformation, detected through GPS, InSAR, or tiltmeters, can reveal inflation or deflation of the caldera floor related to magma intrusion or withdrawal
  • Gas emission monitoring, such as SO2 or CO2 flux, can suggest magma degassing and potential unrest
  • These techniques provide insights into the current state of a caldera system and help assess the likelihood of future eruptions

Indicators of Potential Future Activity

  • The presence of active hydrothermal systems, resurgent doming, or recent post-caldera volcanism may indicate a higher likelihood of future activity
  • Calderas that have been dormant for long periods may have a lower potential for future activity compared to those with recent unrest
  • However, each caldera system is unique, and the timing of eruptions can be highly variable

Multidisciplinary Approach

  • Evaluating the potential for future activity in caldera systems requires integrating geological, geophysical, and geochemical data
  • Developing a comprehensive understanding of the system's behavior and evolution over time is crucial for assessing future eruption potential
  • Collaborations between volcanologists, geophysicists, geochemists, and other experts are essential for effective caldera monitoring and hazard assessment
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Glossary