5.4 Comparison and contrast

Comparison and contrast is a vital skill in writing, allowing you to analyze similarities and differences between subjects. This technique helps evaluate options, explain distinctions, and highlight commonalities, enabling clear and structured communication.

Writers can use point-by-point or subject-by-subject methods to organize comparisons. Selecting appropriate topics, developing criteria, and using transitions are key to effective comparison writing. Visual elements can enhance understanding, while avoiding pitfalls ensures balanced and persuasive analysis.

Comparison and contrast

• Comparison and contrast involves analyzing the similarities and differences between two or more subjects, ideas, or objects
• This rhetorical strategy helps writers to evaluate options, explain differences, and highlight similarities in their writing
• Comparison and contrast is a critical skill in Writing for Communication as it enables writers to present information in a clear and structured manner

Evaluating options

Top images from around the web for Evaluating options

• 

  SWOT analysis - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Reading: SWOT Analysis | Introduction to Marketing View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Reading: SWOT Analysis | Introduction to Marketing View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  SWOT analysis - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Reading: SWOT Analysis | Introduction to Marketing View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Evaluating options

• 

  SWOT analysis - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Reading: SWOT Analysis | Introduction to Marketing View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Reading: SWOT Analysis | Introduction to Marketing View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  SWOT analysis - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Reading: SWOT Analysis | Introduction to Marketing View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Comparing and contrasting options allows writers to assess the strengths and weaknesses of each choice
• This evaluation process helps in decision-making by identifying the most suitable option based on specific criteria
• Examples of evaluating options include comparing different software programs for a specific task (Microsoft Word vs. Google Docs) or analyzing the features of various smartphones (iPhone vs. Android)

Explaining differences

• Explaining differences helps readers understand the distinct characteristics of each subject being compared
• By highlighting the unique aspects of each item, writers can provide clarity and avoid confusion
• Examples of explaining differences include comparing the writing styles of two authors (Ernest Hemingway vs. William Faulkner) or discussing the differences between two historical events (American Revolution vs. French Revolution)

Highlighting similarities

• Emphasizing the common features between subjects can help readers see connections and patterns
• Highlighting similarities can also help writers build arguments by showing how seemingly different subjects share important characteristics
• Examples of highlighting similarities include comparing the themes in two novels (1984 by George Orwell and Brave New World by Aldous Huxley) or discussing the similarities between two business models (e-commerce vs. brick-and-mortar retail)

Comparison strategies

• Writers can use different strategies to structure their comparison and contrast, depending on the nature of the subjects and the purpose of the writing
• The two main strategies are the point-by-point method and the subject-by-subject method
• Choosing the appropriate strategy helps writers present their ideas in a logical and coherent manner

Point-by-point method

• The point-by-point method involves discussing one aspect of both subjects at a time, alternating between the two
• This method allows for a more detailed and balanced comparison, as each point is directly compared between the subjects
• An example of the point-by-point method is comparing the battery life, camera quality, and display resolution of two smartphones (iPhone vs. Samsung Galaxy) in separate paragraphs

Subject-by-subject method

• The subject-by-subject method involves discussing all aspects of one subject before moving on to the next subject
• This method is useful when the subjects have many distinct characteristics or when a more comprehensive analysis of each subject is required
• An example of the subject-by-subject method is comparing two cities (New York City vs. Los Angeles) by discussing all aspects of one city (culture, climate, transportation) before moving on to the other city

Selecting topics for comparison

• Choosing appropriate topics is crucial for effective comparison and contrast writing
• Writers should consider the comparable characteristics of the subjects and the relevance of the comparison to their audience
• Selecting topics that are too dissimilar or lack sufficient common ground can make the comparison less meaningful and harder to analyze

Comparable characteristics

• The subjects chosen for comparison should have enough similar characteristics to make the analysis meaningful
• Writers should identify the key features that the subjects share, such as function, purpose, or qualities
• Examples of comparable characteristics include comparing two smartphones based on their technical specifications (screen size, storage capacity, camera resolution) or analyzing two novels based on their literary elements (plot, characters, themes)

Relevance to audience

• The topics selected for comparison should be relevant and interesting to the target audience
• Writers should consider their audience's background knowledge, interests, and needs when choosing subjects to compare
• Examples of considering audience relevance include comparing two investment options (stocks vs. bonds) for a financial planning blog or analyzing the environmental impact of two energy sources (solar vs. wind) for a sustainability report

Developing comparison criteria

• Establishing clear criteria for comparison helps writers focus their analysis and provide a structured framework for their writing
• Criteria should be based on the key features of the subjects being compared and the purpose of the comparison
• Developing well-defined criteria ensures that the comparison is fair, balanced, and meaningful

Identifying key features

• Writers should identify the essential characteristics or attributes of the subjects being compared
• These key features will form the basis for the comparison criteria and guide the analysis
• Examples of key features include comparing two smartphones based on their battery life, camera quality, and processing speed or analyzing two job offers based on salary, benefits, and growth opportunities

Establishing evaluation standards

• Evaluation standards provide a consistent and objective way to assess the subjects being compared
• Writers should define the standards or metrics used to judge each key feature, ensuring that the comparison is fair and unbiased
• Examples of evaluation standards include using benchmark tests to compare the performance of two computers or using customer satisfaction ratings to compare two service providers

Organizing comparison content

• Effective organization is essential for clear and coherent comparison writing
• Writers should structure their content in a logical manner, using an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion
• Proper organization helps readers follow the comparison easily and understand the writer's main points and insights

Introduction and thesis

• The introduction should provide background information on the subjects being compared and establish the purpose of the comparison
• The thesis statement should clearly state the main points of comparison and the overall argument or conclusion
• Examples of effective introductions include providing context on two historical events (American Revolution vs. French Revolution) and stating the thesis that both revolutions shared similar causes but had different outcomes

Body paragraphs

• Body paragraphs should present the detailed comparison and analysis of the subjects, using the established criteria and evaluation standards
• Each body paragraph should focus on one main point of comparison and provide evidence and examples to support the analysis
• Examples of body paragraph structure include comparing two smartphones' battery life in one paragraph, their camera quality in another, and their processing speed in a third paragraph

Conclusion and synthesis

• The conclusion should summarize the main points of comparison and provide a synthesis of the analysis
• Writers should restate the thesis and offer insights or implications based on the comparison
• Examples of effective conclusions include summarizing the similarities and differences between two investment options (stocks vs. bonds) and providing recommendations based on the reader's financial goals and risk tolerance

Transitions for comparison

• Transitions are essential for creating coherence and flow in comparison writing
• Writers should use appropriate transitional words and phrases to indicate similarities, signal differences, and connect ideas logically
• Effective transitions guide readers through the comparison and help them understand the relationships between the subjects

Indicating similarities

• Transitions that indicate similarities help readers see the common characteristics between the subjects being compared
• Examples of transitions for similarities include "similarly," "likewise," "in the same way," and "both"
• An example of using a similarity transition is "Both the iPhone and Samsung Galaxy offer high-resolution cameras, allowing users to capture detailed images."

Signaling differences

• Transitions that signal differences help readers understand the distinct features or qualities of the subjects being compared
• Examples of transitions for differences include "in contrast," "on the other hand," "however," and "while"
• An example of using a difference transition is "While New York City is known for its fast-paced lifestyle, Los Angeles offers a more laid-back atmosphere."

Connecting ideas logically

• Transitions that connect ideas logically help readers follow the progression of the comparison and understand the relationships between points
• Examples of logical transitions include "moreover," "furthermore," "additionally," and "consequently"
• An example of using a logical transition is "Solar energy is a clean and renewable resource; moreover, it has become increasingly cost-effective in recent years."

Comparing visual elements

• Visual elements such as charts, graphs, images, and illustrations can enhance comparison writing by presenting information in a clear and engaging manner
• Writers should use visual elements strategically to support their analysis and help readers understand complex data or concepts
• When using visual elements, writers should ensure that they are properly labeled, referenced, and explained in the text

Charts and graphs

• Charts and graphs are effective for comparing quantitative data, such as statistics or trends
• Writers should choose the appropriate type of chart or graph (bar chart, line graph, pie chart) based on the nature of the data and the purpose of the comparison
• An example of using a chart is comparing the market share of two competing products over time, with a line graph showing the changes in market share for each product

Images and illustrations

• Images and illustrations can help readers visualize the subjects being compared and understand their characteristics or features
• Writers should use high-quality, relevant images that clearly depict the points of comparison
• An example of using images is comparing two architectural styles (Gothic vs. Romanesque) by presenting photographs of representative buildings for each style and highlighting their distinctive features

Avoiding comparison pitfalls

• Writers should be aware of common pitfalls in comparison writing to ensure that their analysis is fair, balanced, and persuasive
• Avoiding these pitfalls helps writers maintain credibility and present a well-reasoned comparison
• Common pitfalls include unbalanced treatment of subjects, lack of clear purpose, and insufficient supporting evidence

Unbalanced treatment of subjects

• Writers should give equal attention and analysis to each subject being compared to avoid bias or favoritism
• Unbalanced treatment can undermine the credibility of the comparison and weaken the writer's arguments
• An example of unbalanced treatment is dedicating more paragraphs and detail to one smartphone model (iPhone) while only briefly mentioning the other (Samsung Galaxy)

Lack of clear purpose

• Comparisons should have a clear purpose or goal, guiding the selection of subjects, criteria, and analysis
• Without a clear purpose, comparisons can become unfocused, confusing, or irrelevant to the reader
• An example of lack of clear purpose is comparing two historical figures (Julius Caesar vs. Napoleon Bonaparte) without establishing a specific reason for the comparison, such as their military strategies or leadership styles

Insufficient supporting evidence

• Writers should provide sufficient evidence and examples to support their points of comparison and analysis
• Insufficient evidence can weaken the comparison and leave readers unconvinced or skeptical of the writer's arguments
• An example of insufficient evidence is claiming that one investment option (stocks) is better than another (bonds) without providing data on historical returns, risk levels, or market trends

Revising comparison writing

• Revision is a crucial step in the writing process, allowing writers to refine their comparisons and improve the overall quality of their work
• When revising comparison writing, writers should focus on consistency, coherence, flow, and the strength of their analysis and insights
• Effective revision strategies include checking for consistency, enhancing coherence and flow, and strengthening analysis and insights

Checking for consistency

• Writers should review their comparisons to ensure that the criteria, evaluation standards, and analysis are applied consistently throughout the piece
• Inconsistencies can confuse readers and undermine the credibility of the comparison
• An example of checking for consistency is ensuring that the same key features (battery life, camera quality, processing speed) are discussed for each smartphone being compared

Enhancing coherence and flow

• Writers should revise their comparisons to improve the logical progression of ideas and the overall flow of the piece
• Enhancing coherence and flow involves using effective transitions, organizing paragraphs logically, and ensuring that each point builds upon the previous one
• An example of enhancing coherence and flow is using appropriate transitions (similarly, in contrast, moreover) to guide readers through the comparison of two energy sources (solar vs. wind)

Strengthening analysis and insights

• Writers should review their comparisons to ensure that their analysis is thorough, insightful, and persuasive
• Strengthening analysis and insights involves providing sufficient evidence, explaining the significance of the comparison, and offering original thoughts or conclusions
• An example of strengthening analysis and insights is not only comparing the environmental impact of two transportation methods (cars vs. public transit) but also discussing the implications for urban planning and sustainability efforts