7.3 Providing and incorporating feedback

Feedback is a crucial component of the writing process, shaping how writers develop their skills and refine their work. It comes in various forms, from constructive to destructive, positive to negative, and general to specific. Understanding these distinctions helps writers interpret and apply feedback effectively.

Feedback can come from multiple sources, including self-assessment, peer review, and instructor comments. The timing of feedback is also important, with early-stage, mid-process, and final feedback each serving different purposes. Effective feedback is clear, specific, and actionable, helping writers prioritize areas for improvement and grow in their craft.

Types of feedback

• Feedback can be categorized into different types based on its nature, focus, and impact on the recipient
• Understanding the distinctions between feedback types enables writers to interpret and apply feedback effectively

Constructive vs destructive

Top images from around the web for Constructive vs destructive

• 

  2.2 Communicating with Precision – Technical Writing Essentials View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Tone of Writing – The Scholarship of Writing in Nursing Education: 1st Canadian Edition View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  What is a mode? | UM RhetLab View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  2.2 Communicating with Precision – Technical Writing Essentials View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Tone of Writing – The Scholarship of Writing in Nursing Education: 1st Canadian Edition View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Constructive vs destructive

• 

  2.2 Communicating with Precision – Technical Writing Essentials View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Tone of Writing – The Scholarship of Writing in Nursing Education: 1st Canadian Edition View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  What is a mode? | UM RhetLab View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  2.2 Communicating with Precision – Technical Writing Essentials View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Tone of Writing – The Scholarship of Writing in Nursing Education: 1st Canadian Edition View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Constructive feedback offers specific, actionable suggestions for improvement and growth (identifies strengths to build upon)
• Destructive feedback is vague, harsh, or demeaning and undermines the writer's confidence and motivation (attacks the person rather than the work)
• Constructive feedback is solution-oriented while destructive feedback dwells on problems without offering paths forward
• Constructive feedback is delivered with a supportive tone whereas destructive feedback often has a critical or judgmental tone

Positive vs negative

• Positive feedback highlights what the writer has done well, such as strong arguments, engaging examples, or effective organization
• Negative feedback points out areas that need improvement, like unclear transitions, unsupported claims, or grammatical errors
• A balanced mix of positive and negative feedback helps writers recognize their strengths while identifying opportunities for growth
• Positive feedback motivates writers to continue good practices while negative feedback prompts them to make necessary changes

General vs specific

• General feedback provides an overall assessment of the writing without delving into particulars ("The essay is well-written" or "The argument needs work")
• Specific feedback pinpoints exact aspects of the writing and offers detailed commentary ("The introduction effectively grabs the reader's attention with a compelling anecdote" or "Paragraph 3 would benefit from more evidence to support the main claim")
• Specific feedback is more actionable as it guides writers to the precise areas that require attention or refinement
• A combination of general and specific feedback offers writers a comprehensive evaluation of their work on both the macro and micro levels

Sources of feedback

• Feedback can originate from various sources, each offering a unique perspective and contributing to the writer's development
• Seeking feedback from multiple sources provides a well-rounded assessment of the writing and helps writers identify patterns and priorities for revision

Self-assessment and reflection

• Self-assessment involves critically evaluating one's own writing to identify strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement
• Reflection encourages writers to consider their writing process, choices, and progress over time
• Self-assessment and reflection promote metacognition and help writers develop a more objective view of their work
• Tools for self-assessment include checklists, rubrics, and journaling about the writing experience

Peer review and collaboration

• Peer review involves exchanging drafts with classmates, writing group members, or colleagues for mutual feedback
• Collaboration enables writers to share ideas, problem-solve, and learn from one another's insights and experiences
• Peer feedback offers fresh perspectives, highlights reader reactions, and suggests alternative approaches
• Collaborative activities like brainstorming sessions, writing workshops, and group projects foster a supportive feedback environment

Instructor comments and guidance

• Instructors provide expert feedback based on their knowledge of writing conventions, course expectations, and disciplinary standards
• Instructor feedback may take the form of marginal comments, end notes, rubric scores, or face-to-face conferences
• Instructor guidance helps writers align their work with assignment goals, audience needs, and professional practices
• Instructors can offer targeted feedback on specific skills, such as research techniques, argumentation strategies, or stylistic choices

Timing of feedback

• The timing of feedback plays a crucial role in its effectiveness and impact on the writing process
• Receiving feedback at different stages allows writers to make informed decisions and revisions throughout the development of their work

Early-stage feedback for direction

• Early-stage feedback, such as on topic proposals or outlines, helps writers refine their focus and approach before investing significant time in drafting
• Feedback at the conceptual stage can guide writers in narrowing their scope, defining their purpose, and identifying key points to address
• Early input from instructors or peers can ensure that writers are on the right track and aligned with assignment expectations
• Seeking feedback early prevents writers from pursuing unproductive paths or overlooking essential elements of the writing task

Mid-process feedback for improvement

• Mid-process feedback, typically on partial or complete drafts, enables writers to assess their progress and make targeted revisions
• Feedback at this stage can address issues of organization, coherence, development, and style while there is still time for substantive changes
• Mid-process reviews help writers identify gaps in their arguments, inconsistencies in their reasoning, or areas needing further elaboration
• Receiving feedback from multiple sources during the drafting phase allows writers to synthesize diverse perspectives and prioritize areas for improvement

Final feedback for future growth

• Final feedback, often in the form of grades or evaluations, provides an overall assessment of the writing's strengths and weaknesses
• End-of-process feedback helps writers understand how well they met the assignment goals and audience expectations
• Reflective feedback at this stage encourages writers to consider how they can apply lessons learned to future writing projects
• Final feedback serves as a foundation for setting personal writing goals and developing long-term growth plans

Elements of effective feedback

• Effective feedback has specific characteristics that make it valuable and actionable for writers
• Incorporating these elements when giving or receiving feedback maximizes its potential to drive improvement and growth

Clarity and specificity

• Clear feedback is expressed in plain language that is easy to understand and avoids vague or ambiguous terms (uses concrete examples and precise descriptions)
• Specific feedback pinpoints exact strengths or weaknesses in the writing rather than offering general impressions (references specific passages, techniques, or skills)
• Clear and specific feedback leaves no doubt about what the writer has done well and what needs improvement
• Feedback that is clear and specific is more actionable as it guides writers to the precise areas requiring attention or refinement

Actionable suggestions for revision

• Actionable feedback offers concrete strategies, techniques, or resources for improving the writing
• Suggestions for revision go beyond pointing out problems to provide solutions or paths forward
• Actionable feedback may include recommendations for reorganizing ideas, developing arguments, clarifying language, or strengthening evidence
• Feedback that is actionable empowers writers to take specific steps toward enhancing their work and building their skills

Balanced praise and critique

• Balanced feedback recognizes both the strengths and weaknesses of the writing, offering a comprehensive assessment
• Praise highlights what the writer has done effectively, boosting confidence and reinforcing successful techniques
• Constructive criticism identifies areas for improvement and growth, challenging writers to refine their skills and push their boundaries
• A balanced approach to feedback helps writers maintain motivation while striving for continuous development

Incorporating feedback strategically

• Incorporating feedback is an active process that requires writers to analyze, prioritize, and apply suggestions in a strategic manner
• Effective integration of feedback enables writers to make meaningful revisions and improve the quality of their work

Prioritizing key areas for improvement

• Prioritizing feedback involves identifying the most critical or high-impact issues to address in revision
• Writers should focus on feedback related to global concerns such as purpose, audience, organization, and development before attending to local issues like sentence structure or grammar
• Prioritizing key areas ensures that writers allocate their time and effort effectively, making the most significant improvements first
• Consulting with instructors or peers can help writers determine which feedback points are most essential to the success of their writing

Addressing feedback selectively

• Addressing feedback selectively means choosing which suggestions to implement based on their relevance, feasibility, and alignment with the writer's goals
• Writers should carefully consider each piece of feedback and evaluate its potential to enhance the writing or advance their skills
• Selective incorporation allows writers to maintain their voice and vision while still benefiting from external insights
• When in doubt about a suggestion, writers can seek clarification, gather additional feedback, or experiment with revisions to assess their impact

Synthesizing multiple perspectives

• Synthesizing feedback from multiple sources involves identifying patterns, reconciling conflicting advice, and integrating diverse viewpoints
• Writers should look for recurring themes or consistent suggestions across feedback providers to prioritize common areas for improvement
• When faced with contradictory feedback, writers can consider the expertise and perspective of each source, assess the rationale behind the suggestions, and make informed decisions
• Synthesizing multiple perspectives enables writers to develop a comprehensive understanding of their work's strengths and weaknesses and to craft revisions that reflect a range of insights

Feedback and the writing process

• Feedback is an integral part of the writing process, influencing writers' decisions and development at every stage
• Understanding how feedback functions within the writing process helps writers seek, apply, and benefit from input effectively

Feedback in planning and drafting

• Feedback during the planning stage, such as on topic proposals or outlines, helps writers refine their focus, purpose, and approach
• Input from instructors or peers can guide writers in selecting relevant sources, organizing key points, and anticipating audience needs
• Feedback in the early drafting phase can help writers assess the clarity and coherence of their arguments, the effectiveness of their evidence, and the logical flow of their ideas
• Seeking feedback on partial drafts allows writers to course-correct and make adjustments before investing significant time in developing the full document

Feedback in revising and editing

• Feedback is crucial during the revision phase, when writers refine the content, structure, and style of their work based on external input and self-assessment
• Feedback from instructors, peers, or writing center tutors can guide writers in strengthening arguments, clarifying ideas, improving coherence, and enhancing readability
• Input during the editing stage helps writers identify and correct errors in grammar, punctuation, citation format, and other technical aspects of the writing
• Feedback at this stage may also address finer points of style, tone, and word choice to ensure the writing is polished and effective

Feedback post-submission and publication

• Feedback continues to play a role even after the writing is submitted or published, shaping the writer's long-term growth and future projects
• Instructor evaluations and grades provide a summative assessment of the writing's strengths and weaknesses, helping writers understand how well they met the assignment goals and expectations
• Reader comments, reviews, or citations offer insight into how the writing is received and used by its intended audience
• Reflective feedback at this stage helps writers identify patterns in their writing, set new goals for skill development, and plan for upcoming writing challenges

Challenges in receiving feedback

• Receiving feedback can present various challenges that writers must navigate to benefit from the input and maintain their motivation and progress
• Recognizing and addressing these challenges is essential for writers to make the most of feedback opportunities and continue growing in their craft

Interpreting ambiguous comments

• Ambiguous feedback is vague, unclear, or open to multiple interpretations, leaving writers unsure of how to apply the input effectively
• Comments like "awkward phrasing" or "needs more detail" may not provide enough specificity for writers to identify the exact issue or determine appropriate revisions
• To address ambiguous feedback, writers can seek clarification from the feedback provider, asking for more specific examples or suggestions
• Writers can also try to interpret the feedback in the context of the assignment goals, rubric criteria, or disciplinary conventions to infer the intended meaning

Reconciling conflicting opinions

• Conflicting feedback occurs when different reviewers offer contradictory suggestions or assessments of the writing
• One reader may praise an aspect of the work that another critique, leaving the writer unsure of which advice to follow
• To reconcile conflicting opinions, writers can consider the expertise and perspective of each feedback provider, weighing the rationale and evidence behind their suggestions
• Writers can also seek additional input from other sources or consult with the instructor to help prioritize and synthesize the conflicting feedback

Overcoming emotional responses

• Receiving feedback, especially critical comments, can evoke strong emotional responses such as defensiveness, frustration, or self-doubt
• These emotions can interfere with writers' ability to engage with the feedback constructively and make effective revisions
• To overcome emotional responses, writers can practice strategies such as separating feedback from self-worth, focusing on the work rather than personal feelings, and viewing critique as an opportunity for growth
• Writers can also seek support from peers, mentors, or counselors to process their emotions and maintain a positive mindset in the face of challenging feedback

Providing constructive feedback

• Providing constructive feedback is a skill that requires thoughtfulness, tact, and a focus on the writer's growth and improvement
• By offering feedback that is specific, actionable, and respectful, reviewers can contribute to a supportive and productive writing community

Focusing on ideas vs mechanics

• When providing feedback, reviewers should prioritize commenting on the writer's ideas, arguments, and content before addressing mechanical issues like grammar or formatting
• Focusing on the substance of the writing helps writers develop their critical thinking, reasoning, and communication skills, which are foundational to effective writing
• Feedback on mechanics can be addressed later in the revision process or through targeted editing and proofreading sessions
• A balanced approach to feedback on ideas and mechanics ensures that writers receive guidance on both the conceptual and technical aspects of their work

Phrasing comments tactfully

• Tactful feedback is delivered in a respectful, constructive, and supportive manner that encourages the writer's growth and engagement
• Reviewers should use language that is specific, objective, and focused on the work rather than the writer's personal characteristics or abilities
• Phrasing suggestions as questions, observations, or invitations to consider alternatives can make feedback more palatable and encourage the writer's active participation in the revision process
• A tactful approach to feedback helps maintain a positive and collaborative relationship between the reviewer and writer, fostering open communication and mutual learning

Offering concrete examples and solutions

• Concrete examples and solutions make feedback more actionable and helpful for writers seeking to improve their work
• When identifying areas for improvement, reviewers should provide specific instances from the text to illustrate their points and help writers understand the issue in context
• Offering potential solutions, such as alternative phrasing, organizational strategies, or additional resources, gives writers tangible options for revising and strengthening their writing
• By pairing critique with concrete examples and solutions, reviewers can help writers envision the path forward and feel empowered to make effective changes

Feedback and writer development

• Feedback plays a crucial role in writer development, helping individuals acquire new skills, refine their techniques, and grow in confidence and expertise over time
• By engaging with feedback as an ongoing process of learning and growth, writers can continually expand their abilities and adapt to new writing challenges

Feedback for skill-building

• Feedback can target specific writing skills, such as argumentation, research, organization, or style, helping writers develop proficiency in these areas
• Skill-focused feedback may include suggestions for trying new techniques, practicing targeted exercises, or studying exemplary models in the field
• By seeking and applying feedback on particular skills, writers can gradually build their competence and versatility as communicators
• Over time, feedback-driven skill-building helps writers develop a repertoire of strategies and techniques they can apply flexibly across diverse writing situations

Feedback for confidence and motivation

• Feedback can bolster writers' confidence and motivation by highlighting their strengths, progress, and potential for growth
• Positive feedback that recognizes writers' successes and improvements helps them develop a sense of self-efficacy and pride in their work
• Constructive feedback that offers specific, actionable guidance can motivate writers to take on new challenges and persist through difficulties
• By receiving a balance of praise and critique, writers can maintain their enthusiasm for writing and their belief in their ability to continually develop and succeed

Feedback as ongoing dialogue

• Feedback is most effective when treated as an ongoing dialogue between writers, reviewers, and other stakeholders in the writing process
• Engaging in feedback conversations, whether through written comments, face-to-face meetings, or online forums, allows writers to ask questions, clarify suggestions, and explore ideas collaboratively
• Ongoing feedback dialogue creates opportunities for writers to reflect on their work, set new goals, and engage in continuous improvement over the course of their writing projects and careers
• By participating in feedback as an iterative, reciprocal process, writers can build relationships with mentors, peers, and audiences that support their long-term growth and success in the field