Two-Way ANOVA helps us spot differences between groups, but it doesn't tell us which ones. That's where post-hoc analysis comes in. It lets us compare specific groups and figure out exactly where the differences lie.
Post-hoc tests are crucial because they control for errors when making multiple comparisons. They help us avoid false positives and draw more accurate conclusions about our data. Understanding post-hoc analysis is key to getting the most out of Two-Way ANOVA results.
Post-Hoc Analysis in ANOVA
Purpose and Importance
Top images from around the web for Purpose and Importance
r - How to obtain the results of a Tukey HSD post-hoc test in a table showing grouped pairs ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Question about Tukey post-hoc ANOVA test results - Cross Validated View original
r - How to obtain the results of a Tukey HSD post-hoc test in a table showing grouped pairs ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Question about Tukey post-hoc ANOVA test results - Cross Validated View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Conducted after a significant main effect or interaction effect is found in a two-way ANOVA to determine which specific group means differ significantly from each other
Control the familywise error rate, the probability of making at least one Type I error (false positive) when conducting multiple pairwise comparisons
Essential for identifying the specific differences between group means that contribute to the overall significant effect found in the two-way ANOVA
Without post-hoc analysis, researchers cannot determine which specific group means differ significantly, limiting the interpretability and practical implications of the findings
Provide a more detailed understanding of the nature of the significant effects found in the two-way ANOVA, allowing researchers to draw more precise conclusions and make more targeted recommendations based on the results
Controlling Type I Error
Post-hoc tests are designed to control the familywise error rate, which increases with the number of pairwise comparisons conducted
Familywise error rate is the probability of making at least one Type I error (false positive) across all pairwise comparisons
Without controlling for the familywise error rate, the likelihood of finding a significant difference by chance alone increases as more comparisons are made
Post-hoc tests adjust the significance level for each comparison to maintain the overall Type I error rate at the desired level (usually 0.05)
Examples of post-hoc tests that control the familywise error rate include Tukey's HSD, Bonferroni correction, and Scheffe's test
Choosing Post-Hoc Tests
Factors to Consider
Number of pairwise comparisons: Some post-hoc tests (Bonferroni) are more conservative and appropriate when the number of comparisons is relatively small, while others (Tukey's HSD) are suitable for a larger number of comparisons
Sample size: Post-hoc tests may have different performance depending on the sample size; some tests (Tukey's HSD) are more robust to unequal sample sizes than others
Assumption of homogeneity of variances: Some post-hoc tests (Tukey's HSD) assume equal variances across groups, while others (Games-Howell) are more robust to violations of this assumption
Research question and specific comparisons of interest: Some post-hoc tests (Dunnett's test) are designed for comparing treatment groups to a control group, while others (Tukey's HSD) compare all possible pairs of means
Commonly Used Post-Hoc Tests
Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) test: Compares all possible pairs of group means while controlling the familywise error rate; appropriate when sample sizes are equal and the assumption of homogeneity of variances is met
Bonferroni correction: Adjusts the significance level for each pairwise comparison to control the familywise error rate; more conservative than Tukey's HSD and appropriate when the number of comparisons is small
Scheffe's test: A more conservative post-hoc test that is robust to violations of the assumption of homogeneity of variances; suitable when the number of comparisons is large
Dunnett's test: Compares each treatment group to a control group while controlling the familywise error rate; appropriate when the research question specifically involves comparisons to a control condition
Interpreting Post-Hoc Results
Presenting Results
Post-hoc test results are typically presented as a matrix or table showing the pairwise comparisons between group means and their corresponding p-values
A significant p-value (p < .05) indicates that the difference between the two group means is statistically significant, while a non-significant p-value suggests that the difference is not significant
In addition to p-values, post-hoc test results may include mean differences, standard errors, confidence intervals, and effect sizes to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the findings
Drawing Conclusions
When interpreting post-hoc test results, researchers should focus on the specific pairwise comparisons that are relevant to their research question and hypotheses
Consider the magnitude of the differences between group means, in addition to their statistical significance, to assess the practical importance of the findings
Be cautious not to overinterpret non-significant differences or to make causal inferences without proper experimental design
Discuss the implications of the post-hoc test results in the context of the research question, previous literature, and the limitations of the study
Clear and concise reporting of post-hoc test results, along with effect sizes and confidence intervals, can enhance the interpretability and replicability of the findings