6.3 Monopolies and Trusts in Key Industries

The late 19th century saw the rise of powerful monopolies and trusts in key industries like oil, steel, and railroads. These giants controlled vast swaths of the economy, often through aggressive tactics that crushed competition and manipulated markets to their advantage.

Monopolies like Standard Oil and Carnegie Steel wielded enormous influence, shaping not just their industries but also politics and society. Their unchecked power led to higher prices, stifled innovation, and worsened working conditions, sparking public outrage and eventual government intervention through antitrust laws.

Monopolies and Trusts

Defining Monopolies and Trusts

Top images from around the web for Defining Monopolies and Trusts

• 

  Monopoly in Public Policy | Boundless Economics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  United States antitrust law - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Trust (law) - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Monopoly in Public Policy | Boundless Economics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  United States antitrust law - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Defining Monopolies and Trusts

• 

  Monopoly in Public Policy | Boundless Economics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  United States antitrust law - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Trust (law) - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Monopoly in Public Policy | Boundless Economics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  United States antitrust law - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Monopoly constitutes a market structure where a single seller controls the entire supply of a good or service, with no close substitutes available
• Trusts form when stockholders in several companies transfer their shares to a single set of trustees, consolidating control and reducing competition
• Monopolies and trusts significantly reduce or eliminate market competition led to decreased consumer choice and potentially higher prices
• Absence of competition in monopolistic markets often results in reduced incentives for innovation and improved efficiency
• Monopolies create barriers to entry for potential competitors further solidified their market dominance
• Impact of monopolies on market competition extends to related industries potentially affected suppliers and distributors
• Antitrust laws (Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890) were enacted to combat the negative effects of monopolies and trusts on market competition

Effects on Competition and Innovation

• Reduced competition in monopolistic markets often led to:
  • Higher prices for consumers
  • Limited product variety
  • Decreased incentive for companies to innovate or improve product quality
• Monopolies could manipulate supply to artificially inflate prices and maximize profits
• Lack of competitive pressure often resulted in reduced research and development spending
• Monopolistic control over resources or distribution channels hindered the growth of new, innovative companies
• In some cases, monopolies engaged in patent hoarding to prevent competitors from developing new technologies

Industries with Monopolies

Prominent Monopolies in Energy and Manufacturing

• Oil industry dominated by Standard Oil Company under John D. Rockefeller became one of the most notorious examples of monopolistic practices in the late 19th century
  • Controlled over 90% of oil production and refining in the United States
  • Employed aggressive tactics to acquire or eliminate competitors
• Steel industry led by Andrew Carnegie's Carnegie Steel Company (later U.S. Steel) exemplified the consolidation of power through vertical integration
  • Controlled iron ore mines, coal fields, railroads, and steel mills
  • Produced more steel than all of Great Britain by the end of the 19th century
• Sugar refining industry led by the American Sugar Refining Company (Sugar Trust) showcased how trusts could manipulate commodity markets
  • Controlled over 90% of sugar refining capacity in the United States
  • Used its market power to influence sugar prices and squeeze out competitors

Transportation and Communication Monopolies

• Railroad industry saw extensive monopolization with companies like the New York Central Railroad controlling vast networks of transportation infrastructure
  • Monopolistic practices included price discrimination and preferential treatment for large shippers
  • Railroad monopolies often controlled access to entire regions, stifling economic development in areas without competition
• Telecommunications industry particularly the Bell Telephone Company (later AT&T) established a monopoly over telephone services in the United States
  • Controlled both local and long-distance telephone services
  • Owned Western Electric, the primary manufacturer of telephone equipment
• Shipping industry saw the emergence of powerful trusts like the International Mercantile Marine Company
  • Controlled major transatlantic shipping lines
  • Attempted to monopolize oceanic trade routes

Other Significant Monopolies

• Tobacco industry experienced significant consolidation with the American Tobacco Company controlling a large portion of the market
  • Controlled over 90% of cigarette production in the United States
  • Expanded into international markets, creating a global tobacco monopoly
• Meatpacking industry dominated by the "Big Five" Chicago meatpackers demonstrated the power of oligopolies in controlling market prices and practices
  • Controlled over 80% of meat processing in the United States
  • Utilized vertical integration to control every aspect of meat production and distribution

Strategies for Monopolies

Integration and Expansion Tactics

• Vertical integration allowed companies to control all aspects of production and distribution
  • Example: Carnegie Steel owned iron ore mines, coal fields, railroads, and steel mills
• Horizontal integration or the acquisition of competitors enabled businesses to eliminate competition and consolidate market power
  • Example: Standard Oil acquired or forced out numerous competing oil refineries
• Predatory pricing strategies such as temporarily selling products below cost were used to drive competitors out of business
  • Example: Standard Oil would temporarily lower kerosene prices in specific markets to bankrupt local competitors
• Exclusive dealing arrangements with suppliers or distributors prevented competitors from accessing necessary resources or markets
  • Example: American Tobacco Company forced retailers to carry only their brands, excluding competitors

Legal and Political Strategies

• Patent accumulation and strategic litigation were employed to create legal barriers for potential competitors
  • Example: Bell Telephone Company aggressively patented telephone technologies and sued potential competitors for infringement
• Political lobbying and influence were utilized to shape favorable legislation and regulatory environments
  • Example: Railroad companies lobbied for land grants and subsidies while opposing regulation
• Control of essential infrastructure such as railroads or pipelines allowed monopolies to restrict access for competitors
  • Example: Standard Oil's control of oil pipelines allowed them to charge exorbitant rates to competing oil producers

Consequences of Monopolies

Economic Impacts

• Monopolies often led to higher consumer prices due to the lack of competition reduced overall consumer welfare
• Concentration of wealth in the hands of monopolists contributed to growing income inequality during the Gilded Age
• Monopolistic practices sometimes resulted in reduced product quality and decreased innovation due to the lack of competitive pressure
• Efficiency gains from economies of scale in some monopolies led to increased productivity and potential economic growth
  • Example: Carnegie Steel's vertical integration allowed for more efficient steel production
• Control over essential resources or infrastructure by monopolies could stifle economic development in certain regions or industries

Social and Political Consequences

• Political influence of monopolies and trusts raised concerns about the corruption of democratic processes and institutions
  • Example: Standard Oil's influence on state legislatures and Congress
• Labor conditions in monopolistic industries were often poor as workers had limited alternatives for employment
  • Example: Harsh working conditions in Carnegie's steel mills
• Public backlash against monopolies and trusts contributed to the rise of the Progressive movement and calls for economic reform
  • Led to the passage of antitrust legislation and increased government regulation
• Monopolies' control over information and communication (newspapers, telegraphs) raised concerns about the manipulation of public opinion
• The concentration of economic power in the hands of a few "robber barons" challenged traditional notions of American democracy and opportunity